People's post counts

[Shizuoka Dolphin]

Are the only things I look at when deciding the validity of their argument.

Anything less than, say, 2000 posts and I don't take a word seriously.

 

[Parson Henry]

Are the only things I look at when deciding the validity of their argument.

Anything less than, say, 2000 posts and I don't take a word seriously.

No one takes my posts seriously. Where does that leave your point of view?

 

[intensetazer]

Are the only things I look at when deciding the validity of their argument.

Anything less than, say, 2000 posts and I don't take a word seriously.

plop off

 

[Cheeky Monkey]

Bollogs, anything over a few hundred post count and I think what a sad anorak who obviously has no life outside of being on here all day. The higher the postcount the less attention you should give to the poster.......I think mine's somewhere over 3.5k at the mo.

 

[Mendoza]

Are the only things I look at when deciding the validity of their argument.

So that means Kinky Gerbils or Uncle Buck win every argument they join in

 

[Woodchip]

Bollogs, anything over a few hundred post count and I think what a sad anorak who obviously has no life outside of being on here all day. The higher the postcount the less attention you should give to the poster.......I think mine's somewhere over 3.5k at the mo.

D'oh!!

 

[turienzo's lovechild]

Are the only things I look at when deciding the validity of their argument.

Anything less than, say, 2000 posts and I don't take a word seriously.

i'd say UNDER 2000, and OVER 10000


i only listen to people who are in the MIDDLE

 

[Woodchip]

Re: Re: People's post counts

i'd say UNDER 2000, and OVER 10000


i only listen to people who are in the MIDDLE

My opinon counts.

 

[Uncle Buck]

Re: Re: People's post counts

So that means Kinky Gerbils or Uncle Buck win every argument they join in

Too right....

 

[Garry Nelson's Left Foot]

Are the only things I look at when deciding the validity of their argument.

Anything less than, say, 2000 posts and I don't take a word seriously.

I used to do that but I felt it penalised newcomers who's viewpoint might be perfectly valid. Instead I have adopted a policy of seeing how many posts per day a poster averages. The more they have, the cleverer they must be(they need less time to think about what to type...) so the more valid their viewpoint. This allows me to respect the opinions of newbies and oldies at the same time.

 

[Stinkers Bridge]

Anything less than, say, 2000 posts and I don't take a word seriously.

I totally agree.

 

[Kinky Gerbil]

Re: Re: Re: People's post counts

Too right....

Kings among men

 

[Uncle Buck]

Re: Re: Re: Re: People's post counts

Kings among men

Such much wisdom, so little time to spread the word....

 

[turienzo's lovechild]

f***ing HELL

has your post count been altered kinky?


33 THOUSAND?!

 

[countrygull]

I only post with two pencils up my nose and my underpants on my head. Wooble.

 

[Trufflehound]

Re: Re: People's post counts

i'd say UNDER 2000, and OVER 10000


i only listen to people who are in the MIDDLE

I would never express an opinion to anyone who was prepared to listen to me.

 

[Monkster]

Re: Re: People's post counts

plop off

LOL

 

[Professor P]

I don’t value anyone’s opinion on this site and certainly don’t expect anyone to value mine. I barely value it myself.

However, I do have a pretty firm picture in my head of anyone who’s managed to rack up more than a few hundred posts. I see them locked in their bedrooms, Scooby doo curtains always closed and their parents out at Asda. One hand manically tapping away on the keyboard, the other feverishly masturbating.

I try not to think about the people who have posted more than 10,000 times. It’s a far more unpleasant image.

 

[Bad Ash]

Re: Re: People's post counts

Instead I have adopted a policy of seeing how many posts per day a poster averages. The more they have, the cleverer they must be(they need less time to think about what to type...) so the more valid their viewpoint.

Ditto. And some people accuse Kev and Aids of not being the brightest sparks, but their post rate is second to none!

 

[Soul Finger]

I don’t value anyone’s opinion on this site and certainly don’t expect anyone to value mine. I barely value it myself.

However, I do have a pretty firm picture in my head of anyone who’s managed to rack up more than a few hundred posts. I see them locked in their bedrooms, Scooby doo curtains always closed and their parents out at Asda. One hand manically tapping away on the keyboard, the other feverishly masturbating.

I try not to think about the people who have posted more than 10,000 times. It’s a far more unpleasant image.

Ditto that