spanish flair
Well-known member
So what are the new roles and targets of Barber and his new sidekick going to be now the bible of FFP is in tatters?
So six clubs remained firm and voted against the change. I bet they are pleased with us, who have spouted so much in favour, through Barber, of the importance of FFP, are now well p*ssed off after we have turned our backs on them.
Good on Charlton I say.Charlton aren't very happy!
"The fact that these amendments have finally been voted through is bitterly disappointing."
http://www.cafc.co.uk/news/article/20141111-cfo-responds-to-ffp-amendments-2076932.aspx
Good on Charlton I say.
FFP is clearly a joke now.
Unsustainable losses now allowed . How many clubs will go to the wall during this gold rush I wonder?
Good on Charlton I say.
FFP is clearly a joke now.
Unsustainable losses now allowed . How many clubs will go to the wall during this gold rush I wonder?
Charlton aren't very happy!
"The fact that these amendments have finally been voted through is bitterly disappointing."
http://www.cafc.co.uk/news/article/20141111-cfo-responds-to-ffp-amendments-2076932.aspx
Good on Charlton I say.
FFP is clearly a joke now.
Unsustainable losses now allowed . How many clubs will go to the wall during this gold rush I wonder?
Indeed. If I had to read between the lines I'd say TB knows he has to spend more in order to reach the Prem and so, reluctantly, he is prepared to do so. I can't think of any other reason why we didn't vote with Charlton given the way the club has so relentlessly pushed the 'FFP' line.But that's just it.
Are the revised loss limits at numbers that TB is happy to keep spending to? It's an awful lot of cash to gamble away year after year. If he doesn't mind then yes, we will be competitive.
If TB doesn't have or wish to spend those sort of figures then our ambition to get out of this league becomes pretty tricky to say the least.
But that's just it.
Are the revised loss limits at numbers that TB is happy to keep spending to? It's an awful lot of cash to gamble away year after year. If he doesn't mind then yes, we will be competitive.
If TB doesn't have or wish to spend those sort of figures then our ambition to get out of this league becomes pretty tricky to say the least.
Charlton aren't very happy!
"The fact that these amendments have finally been voted through is bitterly disappointing."
http://www.cafc.co.uk/news/article/20141111-cfo-responds-to-ffp-amendments-2076932.aspx
That wouldn't apply to new players that Burnley acquire. It also won't apply to all those Premier League clubs that haven't recently been promoted. And when clubs are promoted, players may be tempted to another club if their contract isn't improved. So I can't see how it could work.I am told that Burnley have a clause in their players agreement that wages go back to the previous level if relegated. Why cant the Premier League and Football League insist on that clause in all contracts then there would be no need for parachute payments at all.