Noone

[Bigbelly]

Killed your own argument dead there. Strikers? When did we ever play with strikers?
A striker, yes. But never strikers....... (unless they were playing in midfield or out wide)

CMS is way good enough for us. We just need to play to his strength, and a lone striker is not that

Time to face facts. CMS will always play the lone stricker and always will. We all can see the probloem apart from thick headed clueless Gus. It''ll be the same on friday, CMS upfront on his own.

 

[cyrilthesinik]

Killed your own argument dead there. Strikers? When did we ever play with strikers?
A striker, yes. But never strikers....... (unless they were playing in midfield or out wide)

CMS is way good enough for us. We just need to play to his strength, and a lone striker is not that

Yes got to agree with you there, but Noone flattered to deceive far to often for me.

 

[Mutts Nuts]

Killed your own argument dead there. Strikers? When did we ever play with strikers?
A striker, yes. But never strikers....... (unless they were playing in midfield or out wide)

CMS is way good enough for us. We just need to play to his strength, and a lone striker is not that

Whats Barnes, a fcuking goalkeeper

 

[pork pie]

Why didn't he play like that for us

Maybe something to do with coaching, or tactics?

 

[Mr Burns]

Whats Barnes, a fcuking goalkeeper

In a word. Shit.
But whatever he is, he's not being played as a striker is he?