No Vicente = Points

[StonehamPark]

I know it's a very odd stat considering he is most probably the best player in our squad.

However, if you look at the statistics in wins with and without Vicente in the starting 11 during the entirety of last season up until today, we perform a lot better without him...

Odd.

 

[bennibenj]

Would always take him in the team though

 

[brightn'ove]

And when i wear my lucky pants...


meaningless stat

 

[7:18]

was definitely the right decision to rest him and Buckley today...now they have plenty of time to get fit and hopefully stay that way for the rest of the season!

 

[brightonmark1234]

i have taken him out

 

[Puppet Master]

Coincidence.

 

[Bladders]

Doesn't help if Vicente is played as a lone striker.

Get him fit, in the middle of the park in front of Bridders and Crofty and he'll tear teams a new arsehole.

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

Can't change a winning team. Bench spots for him and Will next time out.

 

[Max Paper]

Another Great Performance WITHOUT Vicente

Just an observation, and believe me I think the guy is shit hot, but once again we have played a blinder WITHOUT the Dagger. What can be made of this? Does his presence put pressure on our team?

 

[Muhammad - I’m hard - Bruce Lee]

it was barnsley

a very POOR injury ravaged barnsley

 

[GoldWithFalmer]

[MENTION=894]Mr Burns[/MENTION] will be over this thread like a rash-within the next hour....in full agreement

 

[wunt be druv]

No,it just makes us even better.Bring on the Dagger!

 

[7:18]

also had Buckley out too, can't wait until both of them get back in the mix!

 

[Mutts Nuts]

I know it's a very odd stat considering he is most probably the best player in our squad.

However, if you look at the statistics in wins with and without Vicente in the starting 11 during the entirety of last season up until today, we perform a lot better without him...

Odd.

What`s the point that you are making

 

[Max Paper]

In all seriousness, I'd be interested to see our with/without stats?

 

[GoldWithFalmer]

In all seriousness, I'd be interested to see our with/without stats?

Think including last season so perhaps unfair,it looks better if he does not play,maybe the others feel overawed and not able to play their natural game,when he is on the pitch..

 

[Kumquat]

We only beat Derby last season as a result of him coming on. Funny people forget that. It's an interesting stat and has been discussed before. If he'd come on earlier I think wed have beaten Cardiff last week too.

 

[StonehamPark]

What`s the point that you are making

It was never my intention to press any type of 'point'. I was stating a fact that is interesting considering he's without question, the best player in our squad. It's a talking point.

 

[grawhite]

Should never have been played at Swindon, that was downfall of his injury again. I'd have him in the team everytime, a team with is always better than a team without the dagger.

 

[Norman Potting]

We only beat Derby last season as a result of him coming on. Funny people forget that. It's an interesting stat and has been discussed before. If he'd come on earlier I think wed have beaten Cardiff last week too.

Similarly against Pompey as well, 25' minutes of total flair and two goals after coming on us a sub and I think he was MOM as well. Probably a subject for another thread but has a sub been MOM before?