I'll think you'll find is was carnageBrovian said:Actually I think the Labour vote held up quite well! Given the news stories of the previoius week (and the hysterical over-reaction to some released prisoners who had committed the far worse crime of being foreign) I was expecting utter carnage. The North held up well.
Good to see the party of hyenas, grave-robbers, chancers, shysters and limp-wristed do-gooders (aka the Lib-Dems) had a bad night. All of England wants Falmer! Are you listening Lewes?
Honestly not as bad as I feared, we could have lost places like Hartlepool. It WAS bad though I'll grant you.chicken run said:I'll think you'll find is was carnage
Brovian said:Honestly not as bad as I feared, we could have lost places like Hartlepool. It WAS bad though I'll grant you.
Titanic said:Of the 36% who voted only 26% voted Labour...
that's 9.4% of the electorate who actually voted Labour
zefarelly said:I wonder how long beofre enough people A actually bother voting, and B, vote against the major parties to the extent they have to sort themselves out.
Stinky Kat said:A slap in the face for the whole Labour party's arrogance in hastings - god help us under the tories though
Titanic said:Of those who voted (36%) only 7% voted for other than LIB/LAB/CON.
The Auditor said:First time since 1979 !!
Titanic said:One of the biggest problems is that it seems like a wasted vote.
With the current electoral system, we ended up with Blair in power, in a presidential-style, elected dictatorship, with just than 22% of the electorate who actually voted.
It is very difficult to have a vote that counts for anything for anyone other than the LIB/LAB/CON.