Only if both sides agree to it. Otherwise all you’re doing is saying one side should allow itself to be attacked by the other.Thousands of innocent lives saved might be the point in calling for a ceasefire.
Only if both sides agree to it. Otherwise all you’re doing is saying one side should allow itself to be attacked by the other.Thousands of innocent lives saved might be the point in calling for a ceasefire.
So are you also of the opinion the Israeli action in Gaza was unprovoked? Because if not then the two are not comparable.Nothing. Which is why our politicians should condemn attacks on innocent civilians there and in Gaza.
Nonsense.Only if both sides agree to it. Otherwise all you’re doing is saying one side should allow itself to be attacked by the other.
And let's not forget. Hamas started this present suicidal war. In the hope that Hezbollah and (more importantly) Iran would pile in. Hezbollah waved their fists a bit but by and large Iran (the absolute shitehouse geriatric patriarchy) have said 'Hamas, you're OK Mate. Oh, look over there, a lovely sunset and some smashing migrating birds'So are you also of the opinion the Israeli action in Gaza was unprovoked? Because if not then the two are not comparable.
In Ukraine, one side is clearly in the wrong and if it withdrew tomorrow the conflict would end. The same is not true in Gaza. Demanding a ceasefire in Gaza at this moment would be akin to us saying we will stop supplying weapons to Ukraine to stop the fighting, all it does is allows one side to steamroller the other.
Thus freeing up Hamas to return to firing rockets into Israel and planning their next 7th October-style massacre?Nonsense.
An immediate ceasefire would mean no more deaths in Gaza from Israeli bombing.
The Israeli ‘Defence’ Force can then go back to doing what is meant to be doing rather than massacring innocent women and children on an hourly basis.
You think Hamas would agree to a ceasefire? If I were Israel I would demand a surrender. This narrative is all as if the attack by Hamas didn't happen, and Israel randomly started bombing Gaza.Nonsense.
An immediate ceasefire would mean no more deaths in Gaza from Israeli bombing.
The Israeli ‘Defence’ Force can then go back to doing what is meant to be doing rather than massacring innocent women and children on an hourly basis.
So are you also of the opinion the Israeli action in Gaza was unprovoked? Because if not then the two are not comparable.
In Ukraine, one side is clearly in the wrong and if it withdrew tomorrow the conflict would end. The same is not true in Gaza. Demanding a ceasefire in Gaza at this moment would be akin to us saying we will stop supplying weapons to Ukraine to stop the fighting, all it does is allows one side to steamroller the other.
Hamas have already said they would return to attacking Israel.You think a ceasefire would allow Hamas to steamroller Israel?
We can at least give Ukraine weapons and other material assistance and encourage other nations to do the same (in the case of America and a few other countries to much greater effect).Should our politicians also stay quiet when it comes to Putin's invasion of Ukraine?
Boiling the current conflict down into a glib, simplistic “Ceasefire Now” slogan is to ignore all of this important context which you rightly point out. It’s no better than taking the incredibly complicated and multi-faceted issue of human migration and boiling that down to simply parroting “Stop The Boats”.And let's not forget. Hamas started this present suicidal war. In the hope that Hezbollah and (more importantly) Iran would pile in. Hezbollah waved their fists a bit but by and large Iran (the absolute shitehouse geriatric patriarchy) have said 'Hamas, you're OK Mate. Oh, look over there, a lovely sunset and some smashing migrating birds'
That goes without saying - that’s what a ceasefire is - we have already spent pages on this thread arguing against Israel unilaterally laying down arms/withholding attack but a ceasefire is a peace brokered by a third party usually and by definition requires a cessation of hostilities on both sides - in this case, Qatar, Egypt and Saudi Arabia being the heavy players in ongoing negotiations. In the very least, we should be pushing for a truce - the hostages lives depend on it - negotiations were broken off by Hamas on Sunday because of this:Only if both sides agree to it. Otherwise all you’re doing is saying one side should allow itself to be attacked by the other.
This narrative is all as if the attack by Hamas didn't happen, and Israel randomly started bombing Gaza.
That goes without saying - that’s what a ceasefire is - we have already spent pages on this thread arguing against Israel unilaterally laying down arms/withholding attack but a ceasefire is a peace brokered by a third party usually and by definition requires a cessation of hostilities on both sides - in this case, Qatar, Egypt and Saudi Arabia being the heavy players in ongoing negotiations. In the very least, we should be pushing for a truce - the hostages lives depend on it - negotiations were broken off by Hamas on Sunday because of this:
We can at least give Ukraine weapons and other material assistance and encourage other nations to do the same (in the case of America and a few other countries to much greater effect).
We're not going to start sending ammo or rocket launchers to Hamas (and very few people would suggest we should).
Nothing our government says is going to make a blind bit of difference to anything Israel or Hamas do.
This is where opinion is divided isn’t it - some people think this war started on 7 October 2023, and everything prior to that date irrelevant some people think it started in 1967, when Israel occupied the Palestinian territories, forcing many to flee, with rockets flying back and forth ever since bar some periodic cessation of rocket attacks, some people go back even further and say it started in 1947 with the Partition of Palestine and Israel forcing Palestinians off the land.And let's not forget. Hamas started this present suicidal war. In the hope that Hezbollah and (more importantly) Iran would pile in. Hezbollah waved their fists a bit but by and large Iran (the absolute shitehouse geriatric patriarchy) have said 'Hamas, you're OK Mate. Oh, look over there, a lovely sunset and some smashing migrating birds'
If somebody suggests embargoes or sanctions on Israel linked to their actions in Gaza I'd agree with them.But we will continue to do business with Israel that facilitates the mass killing of civilians.
It’s hard to take Hamas’ negotiations seriously when they’re also saying this
We will repeat the October 7 attack time and again until Israel is annihilated, says Hamas official Ghazi Hamad
Hamas will carry out attacks over and over again "until Israel is annihilated", one of the group's officials has warned.www.lbc.co.uk
This is why demanding a ceasefire is simply shouting into the wind, it seems to be more about certain elements of the British political left feeling good about themselves than actually achieving anything.
Don’t get me wrong, I find the actions of the Israeli Defence Force monstrous and the Israeli government is a far right group of twats led by a massive, bloodthirsty ****. But when you have Hamas saying “we’re going to just do it again and again” is it any wonder the Israelis aren’t exactly keen to stop?
If somebody suggests embargoes or sanctions on Israel linked to their actions in Gaza I'd agree with them.
Resigning over a vote to call for a ceasefire without any prospect of serious engagement to solve the underlying issues is an emotional spasm.
It's much the same difference in the circumstances. That's how collective responsibility works.The ones that didn't resign were sacked.
They are as bad as each other.Except Israel are the long term oppressors and Palestinians are the subjugated so not not really...