Robot Chicken
Seriously?
Did a single header of McCammon's go to one of our players? Did any of his crosses (think he had 2 or 3) go to one of our players? What did he contribute today?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
McCammon today
- Thread starter Robot Chicken
- Start date
Rangdo
Registered Cider Drinker
Thats not seen by the fans as contributing to the game though. As shit as everyone thinks he is our best run of the season has "coincided" with him being in the teamYorkie said:
London Irish
Well-known member
Downloaded Penguin said:
Yes, on headers, he wasn't on for that long but a few of his flick-ons found their mark.
How many of ANY of our crosses found their mark in the box today, including his? Very, very few, we didn't have a lot of joy when the Blades were back defending in numbers.
I dislike this style of criticism of a player, all negative, no serious attempt to look for good things about his play, just the bad to vindicate and justify previously posted opinions on NSC. Our players deserve a bit better than that and I think Big Mac does especially.
Millwall wouldn't be grabbing him back off us if he was as bad as you imply, nor would they have stopped him playing in the FA Cup.
He will be a free agent at the end of the season and it wouldn't surprise me at all if he came back to us when Millwall stop holding him a prisoner.
Pevenseagull
meh
- Jul 20, 2003
- 20,455
Downloaded Penguin said:
and we've done f*** all in the league since he's played for us, I'd prefer we had Denis Bergkamp
dougdeep
New member
He does tend to draw the defenders away from Leon at times. If you were defending against us and one of the opposition strikers is 6ft 4 in, and the other is 5ft 4in wouldn't you tend to expect the big fella to get the ball first?
John Boy
Paul McShane
Yorkie said:
Neither had anything to do with McCammon.
When Leon scored against Watford, I think McCammon had just been subbed.
dougdeep
New member
I'm with Yorkie on this. The word catalyst springs to mind.
John Boy
Paul McShane
dougdeep said:
The little large partnership does work. Leon played well with Chris Iwelumo last year.
Another Berkshire Seagull
Well-known member
John Boy said:
Sorry I have to disagree Leon got nearly all his goals in the first part of the season before big chris came to us. After this point nearly all Leons goals came from pens.
Unfortunatly his baron spell pushed into this season also, however as McGhee has stated he's had something extra about him in the last few games. and scoring 2 goals in open play highlights this, however neither goals had anything to do with Big Mark who I have to say is one of the worst strikers we've had since Silky Dave Cameron. Please McGhee don't renew his loan spell he's utter SHITE!!!
dougdeep
New member
So you think you know better than Mr McGhee then?
Another Berkshire Seagull
Well-known member
Probably. 
dougdeep
New member
Fair enough.
eastlondonseagull
Well-known member
I posted about this yesterday. I think catalyst is the wrong word, but he definitely drew defenders away from Leon. in terms of ball play, though, he was very poor. Still, if his mere presence on the pitch worked, fairplay!
Wardy
NSC's Benefits Guru
I think it adds, something extra to the squad. He draws defenders to him, thus leaving more space for Leon. Okay so he might not have been involved directly with the two latest Leon goals, but I am sure that the defenders were a little tired after chasing McGammon only to then have to turn and run after Leon. We are having our best spell of the season at the moment, we look more like play-off contenders then the relegations dead certs we were at the start of the season. All this ties in with the loan spell of McGammon. McGhee seems to see things in players that others do not. Currie was a prime example of this. So if McGhee wants McGammon then I am sure there is something there. Thats why we play the club to be at the games and the club play McGhee to be at the games.
the full harris
New member
- Feb 14, 2004
- 3,212
If we signed my gran to play up front, some of you would still insist she was making a valid contribution.
McCammon is not up to it. end of.
Fortunately, he has gone back to Millwall now.
McCammon is not up to it. end of.
Fortunately, he has gone back to Millwall now.
fosters headband
Well-known member
I can remember when M.M signed Currie the outburst on here and the way he played for the first month was awfull. But credit to M.M, in Currie he was proved right. Lets hope he see's something in Mcgammon, I for one am prepared to give M.M the credit he knows what he is doing.
Shropshire Seagull
Well-known member
Did anyone else notice McCammon moaning about poor service after he had only been on the pitch for about 3 mins?
He did get to the bye-line and try and cross a couple of times, but both were blocked for corners.
Also, did anyone else see him do a Jonah step-over - that made me smile.
Others have metioned catalyst to our recent good performance since the arrival of the big man - don't forget OGH has become more regular too and the first goal at Shef was down to the tacckle he won on the half-way line, got up and immediatly passed to LK when we were 3 on 1.
Last comment - WE WON AT SHEFFIELD UTD - FFS BE HAPPY!
He did get to the bye-line and try and cross a couple of times, but both were blocked for corners.
Also, did anyone else see him do a Jonah step-over - that made me smile.
Others have metioned catalyst to our recent good performance since the arrival of the big man - don't forget OGH has become more regular too and the first goal at Shef was down to the tacckle he won on the half-way line, got up and immediatly passed to LK when we were 3 on 1.
Last comment - WE WON AT SHEFFIELD UTD - FFS BE HAPPY!