spring hall convert
Well-known member
Well you could answer the questions I asked you instead of hiding away with no proof to back you up,I think I have written far more on this subject and answered more question than you have,I have met every question asked whereas you and SHC have not answered ONE question put to you....still do not know how old you are,your work experience.Where you got those headlines from...
I thought the questions you were asking me above were rhetorical - here goes then
do I face facts that they are here ? You can do what you like. It just speaks volumes that immigration is the first thing you pick on. You then use "scroungers" very soon after. I am merely pointing out that this language is from the pages of the Mail. I don't think anyone is a racist for wanting to talk about immigration. I tend to think that they are xenophobes if it is the first or only thing they talk about.
Proof of hate please re Mail...you're not clutching 'facts' from hearsay again are you? They have always been the last paper to back social reform of any kind. They are anti equality. This goes for homosexuals, women, ethnic minorities. Can you name a time when the Mail has ever called for a progressive social reform? It hasn't happen because it is an elitist paper, written by middle aged, hetrosexual, white, (mainly) men for middle aged, hetrosexual, white, (mainly) men. It's alright for you - you are I presume a white, hetrosexual, male.
name your paper,has it a political bias? I will make it quite clear that I don't have a paper. I have already acknowledged that the Guardian is biased but for me has a far better record of top quality investigative journalism (see post 89.) For the record my two most read publications are The Independent (or the I) & Private Eye. I'm happy with any of the qualities though including the Torygraph & The Times.