malcolm prescott
New member
come on guys its great news whats the club saying any press statement yet
My thoughts ... we still need to keep the pressure on them. In particular, they mustn´t ever again be allowed to decide to go to the High Court on the basis of a decision taken behind closed doors, without any consultation with local residents.Rich Suvner said:ok, chatted with a few mates and think this may not be quite the great news that it first seems
if LDC pursued high court proceedings i imagine it would cost them considerably.
however, by removing their objection and letting the planning process continue (ie we seek new approval from ruth kelly), ldc saves funds.
should the decision go against them, they then re-enter the frame with the same set of objections they originally tabled, thus saving them money in the short-term but providing us the same repetitive headache overall.
want to be excited, and think there lack of conviction doesnt look v good for them, but doubt we've heard the last from this bunch of jumped up tossers.
thoughts?
Normandy seagull said:sound like good news but I'm not counting any chickens until that first brick is laid
jakes right boot said:Club release
http://www.seagulls.premiumtv.co.uk/page/News/LatestDetail/0,,10433~906776,00.html
Kelly has has the option to re-open the Public Inquiry, but it's more likely that she will write to interested parties requesting further submissions before making a final decision.
FIFA 07 [/QUO
Thanks any time frame until we get the final green light I suppose DK cannot gather the funds to start building until then
DIFFBROOK said:I do think we have them rattled. Afterall, LDc plan was to wait until December.
The trick now is to keep them rattled. At every opportunity we should seek to expose their lies,wastefulness and total lack of democracy.
Bonfire night in Lewes is a date that we should seek to exploit.
dougdeep said:Surely they haven't come to their senses already.
Lawro's Lip said:Excellent idea.
Rich Suvner said:ok, chatted with a few mates and think this may not be quite the great news that it first seems
if LDC pursued high court proceedings i imagine it would cost them considerably.
however, by removing their objection and letting the planning process continue (ie we seek new approval from ruth kelly), ldc saves funds.
should the decision go against them, they then re-enter the frame with the same set of objections they originally tabled, thus saving them money in the short-term but providing us the same repetitive headache overall.
want to be excited, and think there lack of conviction doesnt look v good for them, but doubt we've heard the last from this bunch of jumped up tossers.
thoughts?
The Large One said:I think someone needs to send a copy of the press release to the Lib Dem top brass, pointing out the bullshit contained within the spin of the release, especially David Neighbour's quotes, and point out to them that they are STILL lying.
My blood just ran cold when I read that bit. Does this mean there is a possibility that we could end up with yet ANOTHER Public Inquiry, set up specifically to investigate all the points LDC have raised ?jakes right boot said:Kelly has has the option to re-open the Public Inquiry, but it's more likely that she will write to interested parties requesting further submissions before making a final decision.
brightonfan_86 said:Fantastic news, but what a bunch of ****s for delaying this for all these long months.
Yes. But baring in mind there have already been two public inquries already the odds must be against. But nothing in this saga would surprise me.Easy 10 said:My blood just ran cold when I read that bit. Does this mean there is a possibility that we could end up with yet ANOTHER Public Inquiry, set up specifically to investigate all the points LDC have raised ?