BensGrandad
New member
Whilst accepting that the poogate was undesirable, now that the club have called in the police what offence cold have been committed and if the perpetrator of said offene is found with what would he or she be charged.
non employee - trespass and criminal damage
an employee - criminal damage, and sacked for gross misconduct
non employee - trespass and criminal damage
an employee - criminal damage, and sacked for gross misconduct
Have the club called in the Police? I haven't seen anything to that effect
I would have thought that a defence against criminal damage would have been easy to apply and defend the case, so the chance of a conviction virtually nil.
I am sure that I read that they had.
The army had a section of Queens Regulations section 69 Conduct to the Prejudice of Good Order and Military Discipline under which ar soldier could be charged if no other section seemed appropriate does civilian criminal law have a similar section that can be used.
I would have thought that a defence against criminal damage would have been easy to apply and defend the case, so the chance of a conviction virtually nil.
Brighton and Hove Albion is not the Army.
You live in a civilian world, so do the employees of Brighton and Hove Albion.
It is impossible to compare the two.
Whilst accepting that the poogate was undesirable, now that the club have called in the police what offence cold have been committed and if the perpetrator of said offene is found with what would he or she be charged.