Lancashire v Sussex - Day 2

[Titanic]

Whats the follow-on target?

 

[Titanic]

That's the 100 partnership for the 10th wicket!

203-9

 

[Trigger]

Lancashire now racking up the bonus points... I reckon they'll get a 1st innings lead.

 

[Martlet]

184-9 Mahmood 65 not out (51 balls, 10x 4, 1 x 6, Keedy 14 not out

that's unbelievable - Mahmood's scored 29 runs off 6 balls
he's now 84no off 57.

Stunning performance. Git.

 

[Storer68]

oh for fecks sake lads..........looks like a bit too mush Mushy trying to buy a wicket


Lancashire 1st innings R M B 4 6
MJ Chilton c Prior b Akram 9 38 24 2 0
AJ Swann c Ambrose b Akram 6 16 14 1 0
MB Loye lbw b Akram 0 1 2 0 0
SG Law c Montgomerie b Mushtaq Ahmed 25 120 86 2 0
CL Hooper lbw b Martin-Jenkins 9 41 24 1 0
G Chapple c & b Lewry 21 31 26 5 0
SP Crook c Montgomerie b Mushtaq Ahmed 9 17 17 2 0
*+WK Hegg c Ambrose b Lewry 3 25 22 0 0
DG Cork c Montgomerie b Lewry 7 9 9 1 0
SI Mahmood not out 85 66 58 13 2
G Keedy not out 14 56 30 0 0
Extras (b 12, lb 3, w 1) 16
Total (9 wickets, 52 overs) 204

FoW: 1-11 (Swann), 2-11 (Loye), 3-22 (Chilton), 4-47 (Hooper),
5-73 (Chapple), 6-90 (Crook), 7-91 (Law), 8-100 (Cork),
9-101 (Hegg).

Bowling O M R W
Akram 10 1 49 3
Lewry 16 8 32 3 (1w)
Martin-Jenkins 6 2 30 1
Kirtley 6 1 14 0
Mushtaq Ahmed 14 0 64 2

 

[Trigger]

Rain stopped play... Lancs 214/9

 

[Storer68]

Mahmood 94 not out from 63 balls (13 fours, 3 sixes)

 

[Storer68]

still raining 214/9

 

[Storer68]

Back out and back in the pavilion...........

lancashire 214 all out

Lancashire 1st innings R M B 4 6
MJ Chilton c Prior b Akram 9 38 24 2 0
AJ Swann c Ambrose b Akram 6 16 14 1 0
MB Loye lbw b Akram 0 1 2 0 0
SG Law c Montgomerie b Mushtaq Ahmed 25 120 86 2 0
CL Hooper lbw b Martin-Jenkins 9 41 24 1 0
G Chapple c & b Lewry 21 31 26 5 0
SP Crook c Montgomerie b Mushtaq Ahmed 9 17 17 2 0
*+WK Hegg c Ambrose b Lewry 3 25 22 0 0
DG Cork c Montgomerie b Lewry 7 9 9 1 0
SI Mahmood c Adams b Kirtley 94 79 66 13 3
G Keedy not out 14 69 40 0 0
Extras (b 12, lb 4, w 1) 17
Total (all out, 55 overs) 214

FoW: 1-11 (Swann), 2-11 (Loye), 3-22 (Chilton), 4-47 (Hooper),
5-73 (Chapple), 6-90 (Crook), 7-91 (Law), 8-100 (Cork),
9-101 (Hegg), 10-214 (Mahmood).

Bowling O M R W
Akram 10 1 49 3
Lewry 16 8 32 3 (1w)
Martin-Jenkins 7 3 30 1
Kirtley 8 1 23 1
Mushtaq Ahmed 14 0 64 2

 

[Storer68]

and now rain has again stopped play

 

[Trigger]

Well least we got em out i spose...

 

[Storer68]

to enforce the follow on or not to enforce he follow on



STICK'EM IN AGAIN GRIZZLY.

 

[Storer68]

Lancashire (2nd innings following on) 7 for 0

 

[Marc]

right FINALLY got the bastards out...now lets get 'em before they get another 200...COME ON SUSSEX AND f*** OFF RAIN!

 

[CHAPPERS]

Yeah, rain. f*** OFF!!

 

[Gwylan]

Perhaps they should have batted again rather than enforce the follow-on. Get a lead of about 500 and bowl at Lancashire on a turning wicket.

Too late to try now though.

 

[Pavilionaire]

The bowlers shouldn't be that tired, only Lewry bowled more than 15. Anyway, you have to enforce the follow-on because of the rain factor...

 

[CHAPPERS]

I would ALWAYS enforce the follow on. Especially against LANCS.

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Perhaps they should have batted again rather than enforce the follow-on. Get a lead of about 500 and bowl at Lancashire on a turning wicket.

Too late to try now though.

Always a risky option. What if we'd got to 101/9 ourselves? Lancashire needing 370 odd in the fourth innings with five sessions to get them? I'd be worried.

 

[Storer68]

If anything mahmoods quick fire 94 might even come to count against them, given that he spent virtually next to no time getting the runs, thus giving us even MORE time to bowl them out a second time............I love cricket