- Thread starter
- #41
Simster said:Sorry twatty, what was Thatcher right about? From what I remember of time under Thatch, we had hunger strikes, constant IRA threats in London, tit-for-tat killings in Belfast and Londonderry virtually every other day, no police presence whatsoever in nationalist areas, unmarked police driving into a republican processions and then being executed, Harrods being bombed, hunger strikes etc. In contrast, Major opened a proper dialog - continued by Blair. The fanatics separated into the Real IRA who then committed a single appalling atrocity which has since completely alienated them and brought those fanatics to their knees.
So no, Thatcher was wrong.
Livingston is indeed opportunist at times, but talking to the IRA is not a good example of that, IMO. What is "opportunist" about speaking to the IRA?
Because he knew the government were talking to them anyway and thought he would make left wing political capital out of suggestion it. It would make him look right on' with his other leftie cronies plus give him loads and loads of publicity. His suggestions / intervention changed nothing and if anything would have made it more difficult for the Brtish government to be 'seen' to be negotiating with them. As it was Major had to stand up in Parliment and say he received a message from the IRA which said the 'war was over'. Does anyone acutally believe that out of the blue the republicans surrendered? No. It was sold to us on that basis to make it more palatable.
Fact is Thatcher was right with her approach and paved the way for Major to up the stakes. Being seen to be tough on terrorism whilst descreet negotiations behind the scenes.
Livingstone isnt fit to lick the rim of thatcher.