Jp

[ditchy]

remains deputy PM

 

[West Hoathly Seagull]

But no longer in charge of the Department. That can't be good news; it must result in delay as the new Minister gets his/her feet under the table.

 

[Goring Gull]

What's he actually doen wrong anyway, an affair or two, now if i had an affair i wouldn't lose my job so why should he?

 

[ditchy]

What's he actually doen wrong anyway, an affair or two, now if i had an affair i wouldn't lose my job so why should he?

depends who you play with !

 

[Gwylan]

What's he actually doen wrong anyway, an affair or two, now if i had an affair i wouldn't lose my job so why should he?

I know someone who had an affair with his boss's wife...he lost his job PDQ.

 

[PILTDOWN MAN]

What's he actually doen wrong anyway, an affair or two, now if i had an affair i wouldn't lose my job so why should he?

if it happened at work as it was with jP this could be determined as gross misconduct hence instant sacking.

 

[ditchy]

Does Johhny P keep his grace and favour knocking shops now that he has lost his departments ..

 

[Gritt23]

What's he actually doen wrong anyway, an affair or two, now if i had an affair i wouldn't lose my job so why should he?

Depends on the jpob you do. Personally, I don't think it should be a sacking offense for an MP, but others would disagree, as it shows him as a deceitful liar, and his job is largely about trust.

 

[The Large One]

But no longer in charge of the Department. That can't be good news; it must result in delay as the new Minister gets his/her feet under the table.

No, it probably won't.

 

[nomad_seagull]

No, it probably won't.

Why not? Is the new minister bound by JP's decision?

Surely as the first post said it cant be good news, at least in terms of time if nothing else

 

[nomad_seagull]

What's he actually doen wrong anyway, an affair or two, now if i had an affair i wouldn't lose my job so why should he?

You might if you were that persons boss, you (allegedly) used company time, money and resources to entertain that person and you lied about it and it turned out that you had (allegedly)done the same thing previously with other women.

 

[DIFFBROOK]

No its not good news. He stays, but his responsibilities will be divied up.

The problems are:

a) the time it will take to divvie up

b) which Dept gets it

c) whoever gets it will need time to digest the facts.

This will take time, time, time.

The only good news is that the decisiion should not change

 

[Storer68]

and add to that the fact that the new person responsible for re-approving the decision may not see it in the rosy light that pescott did.