Jamie Smith signs for another year

[clippedgull]

Sorry if fixtures

Jamie Smith has signed for another year after impressing Gus in the Burgess Hill friendly.

Gus 'He could be an interesting one for the future, i'm telling you. He was outstanding at Burgess Hill.'

Former Crystal palace youngster Smith, made his only start in the 7-1 defeat at Huddersfield last season. Playing well, he was sacrificed, when Kuipers was sent off.

 

[jordanseagull]

Sorry if fixtures

Jamie Smith has signed for another year after impressing Gus in the Burgess Hill friendly.

Gus 'He could be an interesting one for the future, i'm telling you. He was outstanding at Burgess Hill.'

Former Crystal palace youngster Smith, made his only start in the 7-1 defeat at Huddersfield last season. Playing well, he was sacrificed, when Kuipers was sent off.

You do like your commas don't ya

Good news, he could be good.

 

[Dizzle.]

I thought he would be one of the first to be released. Good luck to him

 

[Don Quixote]

He impressed against Burgess Hill. HE MUST BE AMAZING!

 

[Mendoza]

Good player, was unlucky to be subbed at Huddersfield, he was playing well. Also went on a mazy dribble against Whitehawk the other night. Oh and his WAG is rather loverly

 

[KneeOn]

What, that CAM/Center mid guy? Never really given a chance. Glad to see Gus is willing to use him, hes none to old AFAIK.

 

[surrey jim]

Good player, was unlucky to be subbed at Huddersfield, he was playing well. Also went on a mazy dribble against Whitehawk the other night. Oh and his WAG is rather loverly

 

[deletebeepbeepbeep]

He's 20 but about 5'6

 

[vulture]

looks about 9

 

[Tony Meolas Loan Spell]

Im afraid we didnt get them when we were stood next to her and his dad at Millwall away.

 

[luke17]

He may of had a good game against Burgess Hill but i thought he was crap against Whitehawk far too small and gets pushed off the ball too easy

 

[Juan Albion]

He may of had

That makes no sense.

 

[BensGrandad]

Dont think he was any worse than the rest of the team against the Whitehawk team of cloggers.

 

[Halcyon]

Saw him at Huddersfield and thought he was very unlucky to be the one subbed - from what I saw he looked quite composed on the ball and played some nice passes

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

Showed some silky touches on the ball when playing in the friendly at Scunny about this time last year.

 

[brightonbizz]

Good player, was unlucky to be subbed at Huddersfield, he was playing well. Also went on a mazy dribble against Whitehawk the other night. Oh and his WAG is rather loverly

Errr who is his wag?

 

[Scampi]

That makes no sense.

It does make sense. It's common to substitute of in place of have. i do it myself sometimes. Of course if you want to make a petty point scoring jibe, then pull him up on it by all means. If you want to be constructive you could at least tell him where he's going wrong

 

[Schrödinger's Toad]

It's common to substitute of in place of have.

But completely wrong. It's not a difficult point of grammar.

 

[User Removed]

It does make sense. It's common to substitute of in place of have. i do it myself sometimes. Of course if you want to make a petty point scoring jibe, then pull him up on it by all means. If you want to be constructive you could at least tell him where he's going wrong

Ahh.. the classic case of someone thinking it's right because it's a 'common' thing to do.

Who would of thought you would do that?

 

[Scampi]

But completely wrong. It's not a difficult point of grammar.

Ah the grammar police, conveniently ignoring that many words change their meaning over time. Anyway what i dislike is the superior attitude of grammar pedants on a football message board. If you want to converse in a rigid language suffocated by rules then learn french. Leave the rest of us to our beautiful poetic ever changing English.