BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,902
I am only saying that the burglar in the case which Gareth started the thread about was Ill with addiction when he did the crime and has taken a lot of steps to address his problem.
I don't know whether he has shown remorse for what he did whilst in the grip of a powerful addiction but I do know that folks who are smack heads tend not to make rational choices and would sell their own kids to fend off the DTs.
Not sending him down, it turns out, was the right thing to do. The judge will get a spanking off the press for calling burglary an act of courage. If he'd said "absolute f***ing desperation" we would be closer to the proper terminology.
Burglary for greed is different from burglary to support a drug addiction. To understand the difference you would have to either have been a heroin addict or to have lived in an area where a lot of your good friends became one. Wishing them dead is harsh and doesn't speak to the broader issue at all.
I was also an A&E nurse for some years and have seen too many dead addicts to think that the utter waste of those young lives is a good thing for society.
These are similar ideas to the other thread. These ideas are often taken as excuses for criminal behaviour, I don't think that anyone can condone the act of burglary. However by seeking to explain why it happens and what puts people in the position of making that choice we can seek to make adjustments to our society in order to stop it happening the first time or changing the factors which turn a smacked out kid making a bad choice into a career criminal by giving him/her a criminal record and access to a whole heap of other criminal in prison where they can learn their trade. To my mind in this case the judge has made the correct call.
NB: to call burglary courageous is just stupid and I would guess the Judge is kicking himself for using that word when he probably meant something else, but we've all done that haven't we?