Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Is it time to bring the rip off railways back into public ownership?

Bring the railways back into public ownership

  • Yes

    Votes: 76 82.6%
  • No

    Votes: 12 13.0%
  • Take the Bentley

    Votes: 4 4.3%

  • Total voters
    92
  • Poll closed .


Hatterlovesbrighton

something clever
Jul 28, 2003
4,543
Not Luton! Thank God
I remember British Rail and the early days of privitisaton when they still had the old culture. The service was abysmal. I remember one period of about 3 months when my train was never less than 20 minutes late into the station. There was also a perenial 5-10% discount on season tickets because the service was so crap.

Nowadays the service is much better. Very true that I pay through the nose for it but my trains are modern, (nearly always) on time and clean.

I could see how having some ATOCs as publicly owned would be a good idea, but I don't want them publicly run.
 




Hotchilidog

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2009
9,021
The state of the railways is a national disgrace. The rail-user is regarded as an inconvenience by the government and the TOC's. It is outrageous that the private companies who could not survive without the public subsidies make any profit at all. The abysmal First Group made a profit of £238m last year and Southern made £20m profit. A nice little earner for directors and shareholders paid for by the public purse.

In Switzerland around about 3000Fr will get you unlimited travel throughout the entire country for a year, and they have trains that run on time, even when it snows.
 


User removed 4

New member
May 9, 2008
13,331
Haywards Heath
The state of the railways is a national disgrace. The rail-user is regarded as an inconvenience by the government and the TOC's. It is outrageous that the private companies who could not survive without the public subsidies make any profit at all. The abysmal First Group made a profit of £238m last year and Southern made £20m profit. A nice little earner for directors and shareholders paid for by the public purse.

In Switzerland around about 3000Fr will get you unlimited travel throughout the entire country for a year, and they have trains that run on time, even when it snows.
To be fair to southern, they dont seem to run a bad service in my experience, its the abysmal FCC who need sorting out.
 


Hotchilidog

Well-known member
Jan 24, 2009
9,021
To be fair to southern, they dont seem to run a bad service in my experience, its the abysmal FCC who need sorting out.

I'd actually agree with that, Southern and their normal trains are not actually too bad, and seem the best of the franchisees tbh. it is a shame they have to use the Gatwick Express rolling stock in the morning as it is complete and utter sh*tehouse.

FCC are beyond the pale in terms of service level and train quality.
 


User removed 4

New member
May 9, 2008
13,331
Haywards Heath
I'd actually agree with that, Southern and their normal trains are not actually too bad, and seem the best of the franchisees tbh. it is a shame they have to use the Gatwick Express rolling stock in the morning as it is complete and utter sh*tehouse.

FCC are beyond the pale in terms of service level and train quality.
I am genuinely embarassed when i see foreign tourists joining an FCC train at gatwick in the morning , what must their first impression of our country be !!
 




Uter

Well-known member
Aug 5, 2008
1,483
The land of chocolate
The state of the railways is a national disgrace. The rail-user is regarded as an inconvenience by the government and the TOC's. It is outrageous that the private companies who could not survive without the public subsidies make any profit at all. The abysmal First Group made a profit of £238m last year and Southern made £20m profit. A nice little earner for directors and shareholders paid for by the public purse.

In Switzerland around about 3000Fr will get you unlimited travel throughout the entire country for a year, and they have trains that run on time, even when it snows.

FCC don't actually receive a subsidy. They are in the select group of TOCs that pay a premium to the treasury. Southern's subsidy has reduced steadily year on year and will probably have to start paying a premium in the next year or two.

I'd put FCC somewhere near the bottom of TOCs in terms of performance. Southern mid-table.
 


Tricky Dicky

New member
Jul 27, 2004
13,558
Sunny Shoreham
I don't know the answer but anyone who wants British Rail back obviously can't remember it - it was absolutely appalling, the staff were terrible. All is certainly not right now, but my Shoreham to London Bridge commute is much better these days. Southern definitely struggle when things go wrong, but most days it's fine. I pay a lot, over 4k a year now, but there's no local work for me
 


Hatterlovesbrighton

something clever
Jul 28, 2003
4,543
Not Luton! Thank God
The state of the railways is a national disgrace. The rail-user is regarded as an inconvenience by the government and the TOC's. It is outrageous that the private companies who could not survive without the public subsidies make any profit at all. The abysmal First Group made a profit of £238m last year and Southern made £20m profit. A nice little earner for directors and shareholders paid for by the public purse.

In Switzerland around about 3000Fr will get you unlimited travel throughout the entire country for a year, and they have trains that run on time, even when it snows.

Scales here are far different. The swiss network has 824 stations while we have 2,516 stations. Also the punctuality thing is a bit of a myth. Latest figures show that Swiss trains are 87% punctual while Uk trains are 92% punctual.
 




looney

Banned
Jul 7, 2003
15,652
If costs a fortune to fill the pockets of private shareholders. Public ownership removes the gross profiteering that currently exists.

"public ownership" or nationalisation is a proven failure. Most companies privatised became better and profitable. with the railways its better and less of a loss.

Green taxes need to be abolished.
 


glasfryn

cleaning up cat sick
Nov 29, 2005
20,261
somewhere in Eastbourne
I voted yes but I am afraid some of us voted the robber barons in and now any public ownership is very unlikely
 


Aadam

Resident Plastic
Feb 6, 2012
1,130
From what I'm told, we're a lot better off privatised, although we're paying for that. I'd be happier paying more for a service that runs when it should than getting cheaper rail travel on a poor service. However, I don't see any justification for the increased fares this time?
 




kano

Member
Jun 17, 2011
321
I dont understand why government run railways would cost us so much more?

If thats the case what is the motivation for these private companies to bid for the contracts? I cant imagine they are doing it out of kindness to help pay for the running of the country.

Just because in the past BR were shit and the railways didnt get the investment they needed doesnt mean it always has to be that way under public ownership?
 


Hove Seagull

Well-known member
Feb 18, 2008
1,252
Havant
Thatcher should be tried and imprisoned for the rest of her feeble life, for crimes against the people of this country.
 






Doc Lynam

I hate the Daily Mail
Jun 19, 2011
7,324
Thatcher should be tried and imprisoned for the rest of her feeble life, for crimes against the people of this country.

She was a disaster for this country and set our society moving down the wrong path of privatisation. Everyone who voted her in, has to take a piece of the blame.
 




Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
61,764
The Fatherland
The railways were an embarassing shambles when they were publically owned as well, so dont try to hark back to the halcyon days of clean efficient trains running on time, because it didnt happen

Maybe not as clean as the current rolling stock and I have no idea how efficiency compares but they were well priced, tickets were simple (6 types across the entire network apparently..now there are 6 types on some journeys alone), carriages were spacious, the staff on the trains, stations and platforms were generally enthusiastic helpful train spotter types with a wealth of knowledge and the service was integrated and trains and stations worked with each other as opposed to being in competition. We need to build on this with a few tweaks not destroy it which is what has happened. All we needed to do was add reliability and scrub the trains up and BR would have been a decent and solid service.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
61,764
The Fatherland
I am genuinely embarassed when i see foreign tourists joining an FCC train at gatwick in the morning , what must their first impression of our country be !!

Ditto.
 






Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
61,764
The Fatherland
FCC don't actually receive a subsidy

It shows. Their service is appaling and on really dirty and shoddy trains.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here