we were a shambles in the first half in centre midfield. Navaro is ovrweight and 5 yards behind the game. Dicker came on at half time and we looked like a football team in the second half. Also why does virgo take free kicks? If the punters can see all this then what is wrong with the paid staff who cant?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Is Dicker shagging Russell's missus?
- Thread starter eastlondonseagull
- Start date
Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
So why are people still supporting Slade & Co ?
1
1066gull
Guest
Same old saying. Contracts.
I'll sign for Brighton if I play 30 games a season....
I'll sign for Brighton if I play 30 games a season....
SirDouglasLoft
New member
- Jul 4, 2008
- 6,876
We looked such a better team with Dicker in our side! Navarro, what a crock of shit.
clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,716
Doesn't take long before it descends into personal abuse does it.
SirDouglasLoft
New member
- Jul 4, 2008
- 6,876
Didn't think Crofts was THAT bad, would prefer to see Thornhill and Dicker in the middle of the park though, as I've heard really good things about him, from a Forest supporting mate, so would like to see him get a chance to shine
Ian Bairds Fist
Active member
You saved me typing that. Absolutely correct.
eastlondonseagull
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #29
So, yet again, Dicker coming on makes the difference. Come on Slade, what's the problem?
.
.
Don Quixote
Well-known member
- Nov 4, 2008
- 8,362
The moment Dicker cme on we looked good, we then scored.
cjd
Well-known member
Whatever confidence I had in Slade has been completely obliterated by his stubborn refusal to see that Dicker is so, so, so much better than Crofts or Navarro.
Shocking ommision by Slade.
First half Navarro and Crofts were hopeless..........second half, on comes Dicker and all of a sudden we look a reasonable football team.
Many of Slades signings are, so far, looking very very poor.
Shocking ommision by Slade.
First half Navarro and Crofts were hopeless..........second half, on comes Dicker and all of a sudden we look a reasonable football team.
Many of Slades signings are, so far, looking very very poor.
HseagullsH
NSC's tipster
What I don't get with this is that Dicker is not a new signing who Slade wants to slower drift into the team.
He is a player that came in last year and made a HUGE difference. He is obviously the best midfielder in the club by a long way. Just madness from Slade:US:
He is a player that came in last year and made a HUGE difference. He is obviously the best midfielder in the club by a long way. Just madness from Slade:US:
cjd
Well-known member
Others disagree, but I don't think Dicker was signed by Slade. I,m sure he arrived just before Slade came to the club, and was a "done loan deal" by Dick Knight/Dean White at the time.
Seems Slade only wants his players, and overall, Dickinson apart, a very poor selection so far.
jmsc
New member
IIRC Dicker was on loan last season and Slade bought him mid-season.
I would however like to add my voice to the Dicker in camp, I don't understand why Slade doesn't start with him!
I would however like to add my voice to the Dicker in camp, I don't understand why Slade doesn't start with him!
cjd
Well-known member
I know he was on loan last season, but even the Stockport supporters who posted on here, said it was a "done deal" that Dicker would sign at the end of the season........and that was before Slade arrived.
I remember most people on here were wondering why it took the club so long to announce his permanent signing at the end of the season.
Could it be that Slade for some bizarre reason , didn't want Dicker....?
pishhead
Well-known member
Maybe not, but the crux of the matter surely has to be how you perform as a footballer on the football pitch? Ledley King isn't the best of trainers so I hear!
And according to slade, who has seen him in pre-season, and in training, and v stockport for 15 mins, and last night for 45mins, he isn't yet up to his best standard, and not close enough to his best standard to change the team for.
There's so much on here and has been for a while about trusting slade; trusting him to save us from relegation, trusting him to buy the right players, trusting him to turn things around.
Why does this trust not extend to team selection?
There's so much on here and has been for a while about trusting slade; trusting him to save us from relegation, trusting him to buy the right players, trusting him to turn things around.
Why does this trust not extend to team selection?
pishhead
Well-known member
Because for the two times he has come on we have looked much better?