Ummm, might I suggest that naming your various sources isn't a good idea? There's a decent chance that the individual(s) will have broken their employment contract &/or confidentiality agreement in telling you anything to do with transfers. If so, the club would almost have to investigate any employee named on here and, if necessary, take disciplinary action against them.
I guess TB, as 90%+ owner, would be exempt from this policy; though if he is one of the sources, may be somewhat more circumspect in his discussions with fans in the future if he realised that what he said in a private conversation was going to be sprayed across NSC.
Indeed - which is why on the LB rumours thread I said people could take or leave my information.
Some players just shouldn't be abbreviated. LB in footballing terms is 'left back'. If you can't be bothered to use the eight letters of his last name, just say 'Liam' instead. 'LB' is confusing.
But would Bloom let Barnes,walk for nothing next July ?
But would Bloom let Barnes,walk for nothing next July ?
All I'm going to say is expect at least 2 new additions in this window (both of them on a loan basis)
And also expect at least one of the current squad to sign a new and improved contract.
Reliable source, take it or leave it.
I cant see LB going to Sunderland at all. Why trade a potential promotion with a very likely relegation? If he goes anywhere it will be to a mid table.. likely to stay up team.
"dont want to" and "will not" are very differennt things in this context.
What age to players have to be for it to go to tribunal? Is Barnes too old?
I think it's 24 and yes, he's 24 now.
So, we've got
Bridcutt going is a done deal.
The club are planning on not letting anyone go, and will only bring in conway
Two loans coming in and new deal for current player.
All from reliable sources.
So, we've got
Bridcutt going is a done deal.
The club are planning on not letting anyone go, and will only bring in conway
Two loans coming in and new deal for current player.
All from reliable sources.