Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Blackadder
Brighton Bhuna Boy
I want him IF he want's us! We don't need to be held to ransome on this! We are offering him first team football.
If he doesn't come, I am happy to stay with FDM (provded he can steer clear of injury). A keeper is not our most pressing need at the moment!
If he doesn't come, I am happy to stay with FDM (provded he can steer clear of injury). A keeper is not our most pressing need at the moment!
Parson Henry
New member
Buzza said:
I agree with the Buzzman.
Gritt23
New member
Very happy with FDM thank you.
If we had the chance of a good young keeper little Henderson at a bargain basement price, then great, a good piece of business. But if his agent is making big demands, then I'm not THAT bothered.
If we had the chance of a good young keeper little Henderson at a bargain basement price, then great, a good piece of business. But if his agent is making big demands, then I'm not THAT bothered.
Storer68
New member
But FloChegnau is only on loan to us until the end of the season -and what are the slim chances he'll hang around- not great I think - so snap Wayne up now before the close season.
Publius Ovidius
Well-known member
1066Seagull said:
You are having a laff
Best Keepers:
Graham Moseley
Mark Beeney
The two best Albion Keepers
John Keeley was excellent.
People tell me Brian Powney was also very good
perth seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 5,487
3gulls said:FDM will do me just fine thank you. Henderson is ok as cover for the great man!
Barnet Seagull
Luxury Player
Two very promising keepers at the club anyway...
Basil Fawlty
Don't Mention The War
I don't think we need Wayne Henderson, we have FDM and Chaigneau and they're very good goalkeepers. Our main priority has to be two new strikers in this week.
Fran Hagarty
Well-known member
durrington gully
New member
We don't need him,
FDM is good enough
FDM is good enough
Lammy
Registered Abuser
We have the keepers position covered.
Thanks but no thanks is the order of the day.
We need the money elsewhere. We cannot afford three first team keepers at his club anyway.
Thanks but no thanks is the order of the day.
We need the money elsewhere. We cannot afford three first team keepers at his club anyway.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
Lammy said:
Do we have the keepers position covered?
If Kuipers gets another one of his seemingly endless long term injuries, it leaves us short again.
Also the signing of Henderson fits in with this policy of players coming in and being developed. It is just an issue that certain 'ones for the future' have been completely pony.
Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
I think the Henderson deal is dead. If we had signed him I think Kuipers would've gone, Kuipers back in the team on Saturday suggests to me they've given up on Hendo.
Shame.
Shame.
Lammy
Registered Abuser
Uncle Buck said:
As far as geting us to the end of this season we are covered. Ideally I'd like three keepers. Two first team and 'one for the future'. We cannot plead poverty one minute and then splash out on a position we are not particularly weak in.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
Lammy said:
The issue is other than Kuipers all the other keepers at the club are also 'ones for the future'. Henderson has shown he can play with a certain amount of ease at this level.
If we lose him to somebody else it will be a big loss for us.
Blackadder
Brighton Bhuna Boy
Perry Milkins said:
And I agree with Pezza!
Just out of interest. Are we allowed to use loan players after 31 Jan? and if so for how long? is there a cut-off date like there was back in December?
Arthritic Toe
Well-known member
Probably still negotiating the agent's bung.