1066familyman
Radio User
- Jan 15, 2008
- 15,189
Ok, 2 nil down and nothing to lose I suppose, but the gamble to bring on all three subs with 57mins gone certainly paid off didn't it 
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Holloway - a gambling man
- Thread starter 1066familyman
- Start date
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 71,886
Only paid off because we started giving them acres of space to press forward. We were never going to hold on to the lead from that point on. We just looked a bit knackered. Maybe Cardiff game took a lot out of them.
Great to see CMS chasing down everything right til the death tho. What a top player that is!
Great to see CMS chasing down everything right til the death tho. What a top player that is!
Magic Sponge
Well-known member
I think it was a combination of the two. We just gave them too much space after the three substitutions.
Shame to have lost 2 points today but hey, 10 from 12, what a great start.
mcshane in the 79th
New member
- Nov 4, 2005
- 10,485
We were forced back by the better team for the last half hour. We still created chances though.
1066familyman
Radio User
- Jan 15, 2008
- 15,189
- Thread starter
- #6
Seemed to me that they had more bite after the change and started to gain the upper hand possession wise, and gave the ball away a lot less. Poyet set his stall out with the Dicker for Navarro sub I felt
100% agree about CMS. It's like watching Alex Revell, but only with even more work rate and 100% more class to his all round game
Gazwag
5 millionth post poster
I felt it was more Noone off and Lua Lua on when it seems to change, Lua Lua was not the outlet that Noone was.
mcshane in the 79th
New member
- Nov 4, 2005
- 10,485
Maybe but still put 3 great balls across the box that we should have scored or got a pen from