Hinsh or Watto?

[Braders]

watto!

 

[Knightsworld]

Has to be Hinsh but a Watson of 2 years ago would be better

 

[Harvey]

Has to be Hinsh but a Watson of 2 years ago would be better

So true.

 

[Dunkstar]

I'll say Hinsh but i thought Watto looked to be improving on Monday!

 

[Another Berkshire Seagull]

Based on our current defensive record I say Hinch...however he can learn a lot from Watto as far as distribution goes. Nice to once again have more defencive options availible should something happy in the back line (other than Robbie Pethick).

Hinch can always go centre half with watto slotting in.

Nice to see a youngster doing so well!

 

[ojalbion]

dont change it until we need to

 

[bigc]

yup, i'd agree with you there

 

[baz]

Watto for me due to his distribution, True, he did get found out a ot last season but he won't get exposed on his own much in Div 2. It was immediately obvious on Monday that he provided very good balls to the front pair and helped create chances.

Hinsh is weak on the distribution side of his game in my view, albeit still a good player. It is a nice problem to have though.

 

[letsparty1979]

It has to be hinsh, as he is much a better defender and we have been keeping clean sheets which is always good news, i personally thought that Watson was a weak link last year and his set pieces were dreadful, also he is very very slow, have you ever seen him out sprint anyone ? if so im very intrested who.
Gaz

 

[Marshy]

Get Watto in and move hinsh central.

Get rid of useless butters please.

 

[Kenhead]

deffinetly hinch.