Lucky it was a goal, otherwise we would have lost............
Seen it some 20 times even close up and still don’t believe it hit his arm/hand.
Not for a goal, any touch of the arm in the buildup is given?
But, it also did not hit his arm so what's the issue. You can't see it does from the replays either. I think some fans and the pundits are trying to make VAR controversy where there is none. It did its job fine.
Hand ball rule needs changing Nobody apart from those at top want hand ball given for just hitting arm.
Pundits said live Dunks was hand ball and when goal given said VAR used common sense. Just looked up rule and said arm and hand had to be away from body which Dunks wasnt. If that was case cant understand why at the time they thought it was
It’s job being ruining the spontaneous joy of seeing your team score?