Seagull on the wing
New member
Avery much improved playerfrom last season...his passing has been excellent.Dicker has no pace but is very good passer of the ball.
Avery much improved playerfrom last season...his passing has been excellent.Dicker has no pace but is very good passer of the ball.
Right.... Dicker, Barnes...?!.... where do I start?.... second thoughts, I can't be bothered.
Dont worry matey, I wont go away, I shall remain as I see it, one of the voices of reason on this subject,...... I continue to say it how I and many others, see it.Don't post then.
Well he replaced the so called MOM and filled the gap in midfield that had been there all game.
No he's not. He's either brilliant like tonight, or a liabilty. Never just average. Unfortunately he's not brilliant very often.
I continue to say it how I and many others, see it.
I continue to say it how I and many others, see it.
Scholes obviously was world-class but that's because he was a big goalscorer too, which Dicker has never had in his game. What you can definitely say in Dicker's favour is that he fits our style well and Gus has said he's a player he can rely on to carry out his instructions. As I said though, pace is such a big part of modern football and you have to be VERY good to succeed without it.
Last time then,... Barnes and Dicker offer nothing more than squad 2nd line capabilities. They are both slow of thought and foot. They are good club men, but add nothing much of value if you aspire to the upper reaches of the Championship,... which we do..... ok for you TITus?But you said nothing, sums up what you were thinking I suppose.
Last time then,... Barnes and Dicker offer nothing more than squad 2nd line capabilities. They are both slow of thought and foot. They are good club men, but add nothing much of value if you aspire to the upper reaches of the Championship,... which we do..... ok for you TITus?
I look at the table, I see the personnel playing, and I consider how the former has been attained by the latter, all of which undermine your point.
Is it sustainable? Who knows? No-one is in a position to say definitively one way or the other right now.
As said earlier, Dicker is one of the few non-Spanish players capable of seeing a pass before the ball arrives at his feet. Slow of thought is one thing he is not.
Last time then,... Barnes and Dicker offer nothing more than squad 2nd line capabilities. They are both slow of thought and foot. They are good club men, but add nothing much of value if you aspire to the upper reaches of the Championship,... which we do..... ok for you TITus?
True.
I don't think he'd be the player he is if he did have that pace though. He wouldn't have spent his upbringing and slightly unspectacular football career being an intelligent, ball-stroking and poking player if he had the power to charge and burst with pace in his heels. I agree that he should look a little more to blast a few shots home from distance, and i like to think that can be programmed into him. But i suppose in essence his job is to accurately pass it to those who can do certain things better than him and that in itself is a blessing.
True.
I don't think he'd be the player he is if he did have that pace though. He wouldn't have spent his upbringing and slightly unspectacular football career being an intelligent, ball-stroking and poking player if he had the power to charge and burst with pace in his heels. I agree that he should look a little more to blast a few shots home from distance, and i like to think that can be programmed into him. But i suppose in essence his job is to accurately pass it to those who can do certain things better than him and that in itself is a blessing.