FA just about to charge WHU

[Da Man Clay]

So that's £40,000 and half of 31000 @ £15 minus some expenses...

that's just about £250,000 or so.

I'm guessing the club would be bothered if that really is a possibility.

Maybe, it will cost money to contest it (Lawyers fee's ect) and im not sure DK would spend the money needed.

 

[¡Cereal Killer!]

Nothing on the FA website yet or anything on West Ham's forum

 

[sunshine]

Did Tevez make such a big impact on the game that you feel you would have won had he not have been playing?

 

[Woodchip]

Did Tevez make such a big impact on the game that you feel you would have won had he not have been playing?

He was marked by Mayo, and was running rings around him (from what I've heard), so yeah, he made a difference.

 

[bhafc4eva]

Did Tevez make such a big impact on the game that you feel you would have won had he not have been playing?

Shut it women don't have a right to an opinion on a mans game.

 

[Gritt23]

Did Tevez make such a big impact on the game that you feel you would have won had he not have been playing?

That's not the point though is it.

He was ineligible to play in the game, and therefore West Ham should be punished. Other teams get thrown out of the Cup if the next round hasn't been played, so the FA must come up with something reasonable to punish you with.

they can't dish out punishments which are dependant upon that players impact on the result, that would just be far too subjective.

 

[sunshine]

Shut it women don't have a right to an opinion on a mans game.

How very pig headed of you. I am entitled to have a say. We are equal to you, the only difference being your brain is in your pants!

 

[larus]

Did Tevez make such a big impact on the game that you feel you would have won had he not have been playing?

IMO, yes. He was clearly the best player on show that day. He was making things happen for you. Without him, it could have been interesting.

 

[mejonaNO12 aka riskit]

How very pig headed of you. I am entitled to have a say. We are equal to you, the only difference being your brain is in your pants!

back in your box

 

[sunshine]

Oh, and i am not saying West Ham do not deserve to be punished because they do. I am hoping this will teach them a very valuable lesson!

 

[bhafc4eva]

Oh, and i am not saying West Ham do not deserve to be punished because they do. I am hoping this will teach them a very valuable lesson!

You clearly haven't got the message, go do the washing up and if you finish that im sure we can find you some ironing to do.

 

[Pavilionaire]

I recall that West Ham played an ineligible player in a cup tie before (Enoch Showumni I believe) and that match got replayed.

Therefore, given there are 2 ineligible players here the Albion should be in line for some pretty decent compensation - 1/2 of their share of the gate money for the match / £250K would seem about right.

 

[Barrel of Fun]

I recall that West Ham played an ineligible player in a cup tie before (Enoch Showumni I believe) and that match got replayed.

Therefore, given there are 2 ineligible players here the Albion should be in line for some pretty decent compensation - 1/2 of their share of the gate money for the match / £250K would seem about right.

Manny Omiyimni. They lost the replayed game. He got blamed and packed off elsewhere straight after that incident. Saw him score an absolute belter for Oxford vs Rotherham.

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

The former chairman Terrence Brown has just resigned from the board (having pocketed his £30million for selling up) because of what might be about to happen.

Mr. Egg, the Icelandic Biscuit magnate don't seem such a hotshot now aye? Well PLAYED Terrence

The soap-opera of these equally loathsome fatcats going head to head in court will provide us all with high-quality amusement for years to come. 'Polar Bear v Croc - The Rematch'

Meanwhile, Pardew will be quietly smirking

 

[Drumstick]

You clearly haven't got the message, go do the washing up and if you finish that im sure we can find you some ironing to do.

 

[Pavilionaire]

That's the chap! I knew it was a minnywinny of some description.

 

[Silent Bob]

I recall that West Ham played an ineligible player in a cup tie before (Enoch Showumni I believe) and that match got replayed.

Therefore, given there are 2 ineligible players here the Albion should be in line for some pretty decent compensation - 1/2 of their share of the gate money for the match / £250K would seem about right.

Why only half??

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Therefore, given there are 2 ineligible players here the Albion should be in line for some pretty decent compensation -

No there aren't. 'Heeeeeyyyy' Mashereno didn't play against us.

 

[Hiney]

Presumeably Watford are keeping quiet.

We would clearly have won the game if Tevez hadn't played, which means that Watford would hve been entiltled to their share of a game against us at Withdean - around £36.42 I would imagine.

Instead they walked away with £250,000 from West Ham.

Good work.

 

[sunshine]

So when are we getting charged?