PaoloRossiJohnson
Member
Me & my 9-year-old son have just finished watching it (I Sky-plussed it).
GUTTED. Of the ABSOLUTE variety.
I can't understand that ruling which meant we lost.
You win a 'normal' game of cricket by scoring more runs than your opponents (even if you lose more wickets throughout your innings than your opponents did in theirs), so why doesn't that principle stand in the so-called Super Over. CRAP.
GUTTED. Of the ABSOLUTE variety.
I can't understand that ruling which meant we lost.
You win a 'normal' game of cricket by scoring more runs than your opponents (even if you lose more wickets throughout your innings than your opponents did in theirs), so why doesn't that principle stand in the so-called Super Over. CRAP.
Last edited: