I would argue that the fed has plenty of scope for rate cuts, the japs went to 0% in the nineties.
The US' are 1.5% at the moment. I don't see how they can have plenty of scope for cuts if there is just 1.5% left to cut.
If ours is 4.5% we have more room for maneouvre and the speculation (as always this can change 6 months ago they were saying it was going to rise because inflation was spiralling) is that we are going to cut and cut aggresively.
Indeed Eddie George has been criticised quite heavily recently for not cutting sooner (i.e following the fed's inititiave to cut aggresively), but George's objective set by the (Labour) government was to keep inflation at around 2% and not to stave of a recession.