Bring back Brooker!

[Schrödinger's Toad]

Eloquently put.

So we've got Cox on one wing ... and the other?

 

[Silent Bob]

It's true, right now I would take him. Can't see what is funny about it, we only have one genuine winger, if you count Cox as one.

 

[Yorkie]

Eloquently put.

So we've got Cox on one wing ... and the other?

Jake on the right, Cox on the left.

 

[Schrödinger's Toad]

The Jake experiment being somewhat questionable, we seem rather under-strength for wingers at the moment, especially as Cox isn't really a wide player anyway.

 

[BUTTERBALL]

I thought Jack the Lad look quite promising!

He did actually play really well

 

[Mustela Furo]

Have to say that I thought Brooker was the best player on the pitch in the legends game... I know that is not saying much given the age/fitness of most participants, but I still feel he could offer us something.

They always say in football, "never go back" though, so I doubt whether there is any realistic likelihood.

 

[227 BHA]

Eloquently put.

So we've got Cox on one wing ... and the other?

Jakey, Harty, Reid, Fraser. All of whom I'd play ahead of "Bottler" Brooker

 

[ali jenkins]

Was it me, or was SAVAGE playing on the right wing at the end of the game?

 

[supaseagull]

Jakey, Harty, Reid, Fraser. All of whom I'd play ahead of "Bottler" Brooker

Why bottler - Wingers aren't put on pitch to make crunching tackles.

Besides - I wonder how many assists he got when Zamora was down here?

 

[Fourteenth Eye]

That ward bloke who played up front on sat......could do a job!!!

 

[Icy Gull]

I'd have Brooker back, as a squad player, definite match winner on his day and more experience in the team. Just don't expect much from him between November and March

 

[Tony Meolas Loan Spell]

Wardy could teach the forwards about running off the shoulder...