Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
A very murky business at the least and now West Ham face the threat of paying a lot more or moving out
A very murky business at the least and now West Ham face the threat of paying a lot more or moving out
And don't forget "attempts to pass the buck and blame Labour for everything". What an utter **** that man is.Tory darling Boris waves through dodgy deal that greatly benefits some rich tories, costs the taxpayer money and further impoverishes the poor and vulnerable.
Not exactly a new story is it.
Are they expecting Boris to pay the bill?
A very murky business at the least and now West Ham face the threat of paying a lot more or moving out
BBC Website Report said:West Ham said: "The concession agreement is a watertight, legally binding contract signed in 2013 in good faith by West Ham United, who remain absolutely committed to its terms for the entire 99-year duration.
A very murky business at the least and now West Ham face the threat of paying a lot more or moving out
The review says that E20, the public sector company set up to run the London Stadium, is projected to make a loss of £20m next year and a total loss of £140m over its first 10 years.
West Ham were awarded tenancy of the stadium in 2013, however under the agreement the club would not have to pay for certain running costs.
These instead would be paid for by the taxpayer and include policing, stewarding, goalposts, corner flags, cleaners and turnstile operators.
However, the review notes that since that deal was signed, policing and stewarding costs have "increased notably".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-42194382
I still can't quite get my head around how West Ham managed to get such a good deal, at the taxpayer's expense.
I've had to check the date of posts to see if this is a bounced thread. What's surprising to me is that you're all talking about this now, we knew it was scandalous at the time.I still can't quite get my head around how West Ham managed to get such a good deal, at the taxpayer's expense.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-42194382
I still can't quite get my head around how West Ham managed to get such a good deal, at the taxpayer's expense.
I've had to check the date of posts to see if this is a bounced thread. What's surprising to me is that you're all talking about this now, we knew it was scandalous at the time.