newhaven seagull 85
SELDOM IN NEWHAVEN
- Dec 3, 2006
- 963
no we should not boycott the olympics we should boycott chinese goods that would be more effective!
1) That is pretty much impossible I believe. China make SO much, there are probably alternatives, but it would cost our people and economy and others people and economy too much.no we should not boycott the olympics we should boycott chinese goods that would be more effective!
The value of any boycott has to be measured against the impact it has on PEOPLE, not GOVERNMENTS.
An Olympic boycott would be aimed at the government of China. There are other (and better) ways of standing up to the Chinese government.
The boycott of South Africa during the apartheid era was wholly justified, because it was what the ANC wanted. It was action IN SUPPORT of the South African people.
In a word, diplomacy.But it didn't really work that way!
What are the better ways?
In a word, diplomacy.
Any boycott of the Beijing Olympics would be presented to the Chinese people as a hostile act of aggression by foreign governments. They would use this as a catalyst for drumming up a sense of "national unity" in China and then turn this against their foreign "enemies".
It's how totalitarian governments do things. A boycott would do nothing to help the people of Darfur.
That's a good point but you say use diplomacy, do you honestly think that'll work. The Chinese will just say 'yeah yeah' and not do anything. There is no alternative. At least this way we can damage their reputation.
But the Eu won't do that simply because they can't afford to!!! USA and Gb hardly have the most stable economies at the moment as it is. We are in no position.I don't agree. If the EU said "Do the right thing in Darfur or we'll impose high duties on the import of Chinese manufactured goods into Europe", this would have an effect.
The Americans regularly use this tactic - and it's much more effective than boycotting the Moscow Olympics ever was. All we got from that was the arming of the the Taliban.