Albion Q&A - The Argus

[OSRGull]

Am I the only one who doesn't really see much point in it? All it seems to be is Naylor telling us things we already know, We never really find out anything interesting or get hints.

 

[clippedgull]

It does all seem a bit pointless, but it's harmless.

 

[janee]

Agree - total waste of time - don't bother anymore. Just seems to be full of Naylor refusing to answer any questions!

 

[El Turi]

It's mainly an excuse for Naylor to promote the Argus by answering most questions with 'see tomorrow's paper for more on this'.

 

[Mr Burns]

Am I the only one who doesn't really see much point in it? All it seems to be is Naylor telling us things we already know, We never really find out anything interesting or get hints.

Completely agree. Waste of time. But it gives Naylor his weekly ego boost.

 

[Medwayseagull]

If somebody asked what he had for breakfast this morning he would either say wait for tomorrows argus, it will be on the web-site later, I don't know or no comment.

 

[gripper stebson]

The bloody Argus website so full of noisy adverts I refuse to look at it any more!

 

[marshy68]

he's worse than a politican - never answers a question ever.

 

[Oscar]

To be fair, I doubt Naylor wants to do that crap every week. It's surely part of Newsquest's goal to be more interactive with its readership. It's just a pity they can't fund their newspapers so they can employ more staff and more experience so as to get rid of all the basic editorial mistakes strewn though the paper and on the website.

Naylor doesn't give anything away on his little chat as, with five back page leads, second leads and inside features to fill, he needs any info or angle he has for the paper.

 

[narly101]

In defence of the Argus Q&A - there's quite a few people I know who don't use the t'interweb, never peruse NSC, and don't come to the Albion, yet still use the Argus for their Albion fix.