- Jan 7, 2006
- 15,291
- Thread starter
- #21
Wasn't at Ewood Park but even the sit down quietly brigade down the front were giving him grief at the end so that says somethingWas the referee worse than the shower of shit at Blackburn?
Wasn't at Ewood Park but even the sit down quietly brigade down the front were giving him grief at the end so that says somethingWas the referee worse than the shower of shit at Blackburn?
So your a big club if you have a big ground now ? If we were top of the league now, we'd be selling the Amex out each game so that doesnt mean anything either.
We have a higher average attendance than then and were higher in the league than them - at present were the bigger club.
That would make our old sunday side on a par with Man utd......... you can fit thousands into Waterhall, and you dont need to pay or sit, stand where you like..........
The ref was a bit fat and was poor, but for both sides. Our players have become a bunch of fannies who dive too much, feign injury too much and moan too much when decisions don't go their way. It doesn't help get the ref on your side.
Sorry mate there is no way we are bigger. They had a bigger average than us last season in the league below. There is no doubt they would have a higher gate if they were higher in the league.
No they are not spending much, but are we spending within our means? Why do they attract players we want (Boothroyd, Mattock).
We cannot sue atendences and league placings as definers of club size.
Reading are above Villa, does that mean they are a bigger club than Villa?
Norwich are above Villa, does that mean they are bigger than Villa?
If we lose the next 3, and Wednesday win the next 3, does that mean they become a bigger club?
Sheffield United have similar average gate to QPR, but does not mean a thing.
I'm not having a dig mate and you are entitled to your opinion, but lets keep things in perspective.
What the f*** are you on? They come from a scum City, where they walk to the ground and pay a few quid to get in. We have been bigger than them for years. Were they bigger in '83?
FFS grow up. Who cares anyway.
How did Upson do [MENTION=4313]RM-Taylor[/MENTION] , didn't really hear much about him on the radio. Did CMS and Ulloa look like a good combination for the 15 minutes they were on the pitch together?
FFS grow up. Who cares anyway.
Well obviously you as you bothered looking at the thread and posting! lol
This. Comments like 'a scum city' really make the poster just seem either, A, 12 years old or B, just a bit of a tit.
Lol, says some monkey from Halifax? Obviously your standards are low!
Thanks for that.They looked good together when on the pitch. I THINK Upson was at fault for the first goal, which was unlucky as he'll take a bit of a bashing on here for it. He did look quite assured in general and i think once settled in will be a good signing and first choice centre back.
Don't learn do you. What a COMPLETE tit!
Oh do shut the f*** up you pair of piss flaps!
Hard to say how he'll fit in after just one appearance but I think today you could tell that he hasn't played first team football for a while, not really at fault for goal but not great either. When CMS came on Ulloa played more of a playmaker role, put a few good balls through to CMS. Hopefully they can both start next saturdayHow did Upson do @RM-Taylor , didn't really hear much about him on the radio. Did CMS and Ulloa look like a good combination for the 15 minutes they were on the pitch together?
Hard to say how he'll fit in after just one appearance but I think today you could tell that he hasn't played first team football for a while, not really at fault for goal but not great either. When CMS came on Ulloa played more of a playmaker role, put a few good balls through to CMS. Hopefully they can both start next saturday