Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

£2.20 - is that a lot of money for a bus journey?



8ace

Banned
Jul 21, 2003
23,811
Brighton
All these people saying that taking the car only cost me £x in petrol, neglect to mention the cost of buying the car, insurance, tax, MOT, servicing and even learning to drive in the first place. Sure you may already have the car for some other use and you might as well use it if you've got it - but all these still have to be paid for.
 




HawkTheSeagull

New member
Jan 31, 2012
9,122
Eastbourne
I blame OLD people for getting FREE bus travel.

This, if they paid half fare it would more than cover increased running costs.

It isn't cheap, but it isn't expensive. Little bit cheaper in the East - but the service is a LOT worse. With The Key, I'm fairly sure that PAYG will eventually be put on it - so singles would be cheaper like Oyster.
 




Colossal Squid

Returning video tapes
Feb 11, 2010
4,906
Under the sea
My month ticket went up £9 in one month to about £65.

The service is excellent but the percentage of price hike there was bonkers. That + the train price going up so rapidly is making me start to consider looking at a car for my trip to haywards heath each day which I would never have thought about previously. Kind of defeats the object really.

I drive to Haywards Heath every day and recently calculated that with the cost of running my car, including tax and insurance and the petrol I use each day, it comes in at near enough EXACTLY the same cost as catching a train. With the advantage that I don't need to walk for forty minutes each end OR fight for a seat.

Honestly didn't expect it, but the maths all adds up. Although I've not included the capital cost of buying the car in the first place
 


Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,686
All these people saying that taking the car only cost me £x in petrol, neglect to mention the cost of buying the car, insurance, tax, MOT, servicing and even learning to drive in the first place. Sure you may already have the car for some other use and you might as well use it if you've got it - but all these still have to be paid for.
No, wrong. I already have the car so its purchase price, the tax, MOT, insurance and even my driving lessons are still the same whether I use the car or not. In other words they are all fixed costs and would be exactly the same if I did 10 miles or 100,000 miles a year. Apart from the petrol the only marginal costs are the wear and tear on the car and any extra depreciation caused by me adding an additional four miles - and even that won't apply if I've no intention of trading the car in.

If I learnt to drive and bought a car specifically so as not to have to use a bus then your argument would be valid.
 








halbpro

Well-known member
Jan 25, 2012
2,898
Brighton
I think mine's now £65 a month. I use it at least 5 days a week, for work, which comes out at about £3.25 a day. Whilst I wouldn't call that particularly cheap, I don't think it's outrageous either.

Of course for people buying day to day I agree it's exceptionally expensive. I also agree with the complaints about no pay as you go system, and I'm hoping this might change once it becomes integrated with the train smartcard system. They look like they're introducing the Plusbus system on the rail smartcards soon (it says 'Autumn 2012'), and pay as you go (for the trains at least) by Spring. Hopefully, with these systems seemingly becoming closer integrated, we'll see that pay as you go spill over to the buses. At the very least I'd buy a season that combines buses and trains, which I'm hoping will be available soon with Plusbus.
 




Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,686
I did qualify my arguement with this:
Indeed, which I think will be the case for most people. Therefore for most it IS only the marginal costs of the trip that has to be taken into account, the fixed costs are irrelevant.
 








Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
61,764
The Fatherland
"any man who finds himself on a bus at the age of 26 can account himself a failure" - Thatcher

I'd say to be able to afford Brighton and Hove Buses you need to be a success. I have to slum it in a taxi these days.
 




RexCathedra

Aurea Mediocritas
Jan 14, 2005
3,508
Vacationland
Subsidies go down. Fares go up. No public transport system in the world that isn't a real-estate firm with the odd train attached (i.e. Japan's big cities, HK) survives without subsidies.

The present climate isn't exactly subsidy-friendly, is it?
 




Garage_Doors

Originally the Swankers
Jun 28, 2008
11,790
Brighton
All these people saying that taking the car only cost me £x in petrol, neglect to mention the cost of buying the car, insurance, tax, MOT, servicing and even learning to drive in the first place. Sure you may already have the car for some other use and you might as well use it if you've got it - but all these still have to be paid for.

I have to have one for work, so it a fixed cost weather i use the bus or not, so it is just the cost of the fuel.
 




Barrel of Fun

Abort, retry, fail
You mean Go-Ahead Group of course. And probably not, fare rises cover the running costs which the government/councils dont cover - apparently.

Whoops. Yes I do!

I fail to see how running costs are rising so much that they have to ram up prices. I guess they have invested in a lot of new buses. I'd be quite happy to travel in a tatty, but green bus.
 






Tomnorthi

New member
Jan 2, 2010
2,107
BN15
£2.50 can get me to Hove and back on the train from Lancing. So yeah a bit excessive.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here