So why do the establishment consider a 7 year old in a hat "a threat" or "health and safety risk" or whatever stupid reason he shouldnt - but the wearing of wigs is ok...?
To be honest, I would want to be a member of a union where if I was being sacked for, say, driving a train drunk as a skunk, they would all go on strike to back my "unfair" dismissal - even tho I was in the wrong.
Exactly and the beef is how stupid that "rule" is (and those who do not have the common sense to "think outside the box")...compared to others getting away with wearing wigs, how a 7 yr old is going to cause trouble etc etc
Buzzer is not saying that HIS son is an exception. Or that they should make an exception for his son.
What he is saying is that for CHILDREN in general (who lets face it pose no threat at all)this "rule" was enforced by a stupid, idiotic prat(s) who could quite clearly not think for...
Is this a blessing in disguise tho?
I love whingy but he has been a bit out of sorts this season.
Consensus seems to be that Tunnicliffe and Elphick are forming a good partnership, so that means Virgs can play right back (and keep his place as per his contract).
El Abds is also doing ok now...