Of course not.
The only black mark (such as it is) is not dispensing with Sami back in Sept/Oct when it was clear he was out of his depth. Then when the poor fella resigned we actually tried to keep him!
Because you have to pay them off with an upfront payment which maybe we dont have. Whereas we can afford the monthly wage. Just a thought. I do agree tho.
I would say thats down to Burke. Who was relieved of his duties so thankfully steps were taken
i still want an answer re sami tho. Why try and keep him when it was clear he was out of his depth AND a resignation means no compensation!
Apparantly thats value for money.
I would like to know what Gordon Smiths salary demands were. He probably cant come up with blue sky thinking, thought grenades or long winded replies to emails tho can Gord.
Why was it reported that we were trying to keep Sami when he offered his resignation as the man was clearly out of his depth? Bearing in mind a resignation means no compensation payment so please explain the thought process.
Thank you.
Undecided. Sadly after many years Im moving into customer territory and therefore if the product is L1 then NO. If it is Champ then yes. Thats my minimum standard I expect to guarantee my renewal. Otherwise its picking and choosing games.
Yep. This way Palace get a fee as he will be in demand and the potential new club will also have to meet Muzza wage demands.
Its what they call a Win/Win
Can we please once and for all put to bed Burkes team signed Ulloa.
No. In fact Burke sacked the scout that found him. Ulloa had been tracked for about 18mts prior to Burkes arrival. So while he may have been at the "signing of the contract" him or his team didnt find him.
Well Sami was partly responsible and he resigned thankfully ALTHOUGH the club should have pulled the trigger much earlier. I called it in Sept so they should have listened to me. As should NSC but there you go.
Also Burke was sacked (thank god) as he was responsible for our car crash summer...