Search results

http://nortr3nixy.nimpr.uk/showthread.php?365325-Watford-Loyalty-Points/page7&highlight=watford+loyalty+points

Yes they do Last season 190 STH now replaced by 200 So if you have 253 now in the example this is 200 STH and 53 match points - last season would have finished with 190 STH and 106 match points. The 106 is halved and the 190 is now 200 = 253

Correct data for Watford LAST SEASON Watford On-sale dates Points required Tuesday 10th July STHs with 284+ Season Ticket Holder Points Wednesday 11th July STHs with 230+ Season Ticket Holder Points* Thursday 12th July STHs with 202+ Season Ticket Holder Points* Friday 13th July All Season...

EDIT Ignore this is 2017 :facepalm: LAST SEASON in case of confusion, so I would guess 10 points higher for the 10 points STH increase Tue 25th July – STHs with 248 Season Ticket Holder Points Wed 26th July – STHs with 229 Season Ticket Holder Points Fri 28th July – STHs with 188 Season...

You have 200 points for being a STH since the Amex opened and last season you had 106 home cup/away match points which are now halved

So essentially like the BHAFC official twitter feed

There are the following registered at the same address Zaha Promotions Limited Zaha Properties Limited both have Zaha as one of the two directors, and comically Long Live Zaha Limited With Zaha the only director, its only got assets of £1,600, surely missing a few zeros.

Its suggest that you need a strong relationship for them to be able to buy tickets for you and vice versa, I made sure all mind are strong just in case

I suppose for a cricket fan who isn't a football aficionado (I'm sure they are some) looking at knockout football match it may strike them as rather bizarre to go to the lengths of a penalty shootout rather than base it on shots on target. You could have one team who defend for 120 minutes show...

Maybe you should look at the ball before and the dreadful bit of fielding to allow a 6 to be scored instead of Stokes wicket, the following 6 would then never have happened and you would have won by a dozen or so runs.

And if VAR had correctly sent off Walker we might have got to the cup final

It would be if that was the rule

There was some chap interviewed on 5live this morning who had attended the first two and was there at Lords today

:thumbsup:

If the rules were different the two run outs at the end may not have happened though

*snigger*

And we gave them 18 free runs and an extra 3 overs

30 (lb 12, nb 1, w 17) This is where we may lose it

:facepalm: yes that just worked well didn't it

Get that Woman out of the commentary box FFS