Search results

VAR is still a human decision, unlike cricket or tennis. So VAR isn't really a 100% correct answer, so we are better off without it.

I should be so lucky... lucky, lucky, lucky...

Murray was handball, whatever way you dress it up. VAR is still human error.

You make the huge mistake of thinking for someone else. Usually I would stop reading right there. I never watch women's tennis, except when I went to Wimbledon and had no choice, but no commentators or pundits. I would be irritated if I were to watch women's tennis and listening to Henman...

At least Kylie is a 50 something, more of a chance.

Wilko, come on... it's bollocks

Alex Scott can be my mate to if she's ever in need of a grey 54 year old with a pot belly and no money... nah ain't gonna happen!

I agree, but it is still human mistakes.

Apologies, you can be my mate :laugh:

I refer you to Glen Murray yesterday. VAR DOES NOT WORK!

Leicester v Wolves, absolutely disgraceful decision, VAR gets worse and worse and... Just watched it.

Not your mate and, if generally it isn't your 25,000+ posts have been wasted.

When do you get to lick his bottom?

Pulp Fiction, I think the epiphany scene.

If a mod banned me for not liking them, they quite simply should not be a mod, or PAR (Post Asst Referee), which would be a fault on this whole NSC site. Guinness Boy is, to me, and I mean me, a complete and utter ahole. He has no right to comment on my posts since he took the piss out of mental...

Shoot me, I misspelled. And I really do.

Pie charts only start from August 17 shirley?

I think he's one of these internet 'clever' boys that never really thinks before he types.

Three changes then. Not as we were. Personally I'll let GP decide. We still have little idea about his thinking, so I'll take what he dishes up, as for Duffy losing his place? You need to see a doctor.

Both probably, but sincerely the cancer.