Search results

He may "look" better this season but that's clearly a confidence thing. Not just in himself, but in the players in front of him. He does more this season, such as coming for more crosses, but he isn't a better goalkeeper than he was. It's just that people gave him unwarranted criticism last...

He hasn't really improved much at all this season, he didn't need to. He's an excellent goalkeeper, the best "attacking" keeper in the country, great shot - stopper, commanding in and around the box, a good communicator and he's huge. People are finally beginning to realise just what we have...

But if you mention them together then it's a city ☺

Er far ☺

It's not very car in a cab.

Right that's you off my Christians card list.

There's some weird looking git in my seat 😢

Seconded.

Interesting and informative thanks. Hopefully, we will fair better up front with the attacking options we have, appearing to suit Hughton's current passing style, but only time will tell.

Never seen him. Just been told he can pass, tackle and run ☺

My Liverpool - supporting mate from my uni days, who now lives in the land of the criminal ex - pats, reckons this guy can play a bit. He went as far as to say you won't miss Tex if you do sign him.

Just a thought, but putting that kind of (albeit) fake url into an open forum may not be the wisest of moves in the current climate

Or should that be angling ☺

It's certainly not entrapment. Bait, who knows, or cares? This is the law, not a fishing program.

Not relevant in this case. In UK criminal law, the defendant would need to be induced to commit an offence that otherwise they would have had no intention to commit, in order to fall foul of entrapment.

My pleasure [emoji3]

[emoji3]

There is no defence of entrapment in English law.

He was tried here, so shouldn't actually matter.

Useless.