Search results

Leeds have been absolutely shocking so far. No Idea what the latest takeover will bring but theyre in danger of falling away again

Has bridcutt definitely been.sold today then. I must've missed that

Slightly over dramatic. See what business is done come the end of the month and then make sweepinh judgements. playing 1 up front chances are barnees would've been in and out of the starting libe up. hardly a sign of th3 beating heart

The Leeds bid could always be higher based on amount paid up front or differently structured add ons. Say for example Burnley offer 750k plus 20% sell on but Leeds offer 900k plus 10% sell on.

Farewell Liam, does this cancel out any entitlement to loyalty payments

Sorry. Having checked back, you asked if there was anywhere Gus had mentioned Brighton or players. I was answering that rather than specoficaply re bridcutt

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/gus-poyet-wants-sunderland-bottom-2975709 There you go thunder bolt

Oops

Don't have the paper to hand and on phone. Fairly sure would have been an interview in the Sun but not got access to website to find it

There was definitely a piece a week or so ago in one of the tabloids in which Gus said he knew how we done business and had no qualms about going after our players so not just Di Fanti leaking it at all

The article does say close to agreeing a fee which could rise to 5m

Thread on the Sunderland forum claiming a source at Brighton with links to Newcastle united claimed Bridcutt refused to play yesterday to force a move

Club said precautionary measure due to niggle I believe, same as for Lopez and kusczak

Anyone at home

Are the london fireworks for example not largelyfinanced by private business sponsorship.?

Funny how just a week or so ago Gus was waxing lyrical about his belief that if a player was under contract he should honour that contract. I believe he was referring to his Sunderland players who are currently playing for new deals

I would have thought it would go to tribunal because of his age

I was making a general comment rather than on the specific situation. Maybe there are funds more readily available for loans and frees, none of us know how Sunderland work out their budgets.

And we all know that Gus always speaks the truth

The mail have it as Sunderland needing to pay 5 million to prise Liam away