Search results

Do you seriously believe he hasn't told them that? I don't think they're overawed, just, against some teams, outclassed. If those teams play to their best and we do too, we'll lose simply because, man-for-man, they have more talent than we do. Even if we'd employed your unique brand of...

There is no way he would something as naive as that.

Can't speak for all 1901 areas but in the one I'm in, your description is nonsense! Unfortunately, there are many who want to criticise 1901, for whatever reason, so will do so regardless of the facts. The word 'corporate' is ridiculously over-used and mis-used, mostly in a sneering way.

My son and I are in 1901 and I totally disagree with your description of the inhabitants being 'corporate' and 'jollied'. I have seen very few that I put in that category and actually saw as many when we were in WSL. Everyone I meet and talk to are just like us ... genuine, dyed-in-the-wool...

In order to come to that conclusion you must have observed him closely at his work over a period of time. It was good of the Club to give you such access. In which areas, do you feel, has he not come up to standard?

Quite right! Let's dispense with sponsors and make TONY pay for everything!

Quite right! Let's dispense with sponsors and make TONY pay for everything!

Not the most attractive logo but I really don't care. It won't make the slightest difference to the way we play. It's great for those who love to criticise our shirt designs, though! It wouldn't matter what the logo looked like or who the sponsor was, they'd have their post written before the...

How do you know it's 'PB primarily'? Do you have some inside information? TB holds the purse strings ... not him?

Don't know why PB bothers with this stuff. The majority of NSC either don't agree with him or, regardless of what he says, don't WANT to agree with him. If he said 2 + 2 = 4, there are many who would be desperate to disagree with him. In his position I'd have left well alone, taken the...

As usual, totally unfunny, completely lacking in wit and extremely juvenile. Now we can add tasteless. The sad thing is that, on the rare occasions when you drop this sort of brainless drivel, and post something sensible about BHA and the football, you have some interesting things to say.

Terrific effort? It was pathetic, childish, totally devoid of wit, and utterly pointless. Strange sense of humour? Totally lacking in humour. Not even worthy of his primary school playground.

Some very precious people on here! I have no problem with what he said. He's entitled to his opinion just as much as we are. Disagree with him by all means, but to say say he shouldn't voice that opinion is pathetic. Just because someone earns more money than we do doesn't disqualify them...

Disappointed but not downhearted. BHA still exists and my passion for the club is unchanged. There have been far worse times during my almost 60 years of support for the Albion. Bring on West Brom!

If I were Paul Barber I would give you a response; it wouldn't be very corporate but you'd certainly be able to decipher it ... !!

Bloody hell, you are manically desperate to criticise the Argus, aren't you? How do you know it's only hearsay?

Thank you for that adult response. You may congratulate yourself on that all evening!

Just like everyone else on here, I don't know the facts, which means I am not qualified to criticise ... or praise. Perhaps it's your arrogance that makes you feel justified in criticising without knowing anything about what the club's efforts have been in the transfer market.

No, it's easier just to criticise and not bother with any facts, isn't it? Facts are just boring and, if you're unlucky, they could take away the opportunity to criticise!

Is that true about the £1m? Source? And what were the wages on top of that?