chip
Well-known member
This will yield Mossad good identity and other intelligence on Hezbollah activists
The objective of the IRA and Sin Fein was to create a united Irish State. The objective of the Tamil Tigers was to create an independent Tamil State. Neither of those terrorist organisations are still operating militarily but neither has achieved their original objective.There are many reasons why my left eyebrow raised itself several times reading that.
For example, the objective of Hezbollah and Hamas is not to create independent Arab states on the West bank and in Palestine and live happily ever after. The objective is to drive the Jews into the sea. They could indeed choose another path to achieve that, but it wouldn't make things better.
As I have said before, if my old mum had had a cock she'd have been my dad.
Russia (Putin) wants to reinstate the old USSR, so won’t stop at Ukraine.Russia's objective is to destroy the Ukrainian state. Hezbolloh's objective is to destroy the Israeli state. The difference is only how they are executing their plans. So, would it be acceptable for Ukraine to do what Israel has done?
Yep.And round and round we go.
There isn't much that they don't know... they of course miss the odd operational detail like we saw last year, but Mossad and the other very efficient Israeli agencies are generally on top of most major Islamist organisations.This will yield Mossad good identity and other intelligence on Hezbollah activists
Discussion points I am hearing through various people closer to it than most of us.... Iran buys pagers en masse from a source, eventually the supplier, Taiwan in this case, ships and this gets intercepted by Israel, 'adjusted' for operational use, continued on its way and distributed for Hezbollah use,... about to get outed, boom... such is the world we live in.Meanwhile the BBC are following an interesting and quite extraordinary story about the alleged manufacturer of the pagers that blew up yesterday
The objective of the IRA and Sin Fein was to create a united Irish State. The objective of the Tamil Tigers was to create an independent Tamil State. Neither of those terrorist organisations are still operating militarily but neither has achieved their original objective.
Good pointThis will yield Mossad good identity and other intelligence on Hezbollah activists
With respect, Jordan and Egypt are not Iran.Israel has been attacked by Egypt more than once but now there is peace between them, as there is with Jordan. It is possible.
the "odd operational detail" like a planned incursion? muppet indeedThere isn't much that they don't know... they of course miss the odd operational detail like we saw last year, but Mossad and the other very efficient Israeli agencies are generally on top of most major Islamist organisations.
Yes, I'm aware that the Tigers were defeated and effectively ceased to exist. As I said in an earlier post, terrorist/freedom fighter organisations stop operating for various reasons: some achieve their objective politically, some renounce violence and adopt a political strategy to work towards their objective, some change their objective, and some are effectively destroyed.The Tamil Tigers did not reach a negotiated resolution. There were defeated militarily.
Sinn Fein is now the largest party in Northern Ireland, but they and the IRA never had sufficient traction in the South to sustain a realistic chance of military victory in the North. They knew soon enough they could never win 'the war'. Catholics in the north were discriminated against, but changes in the law particularly relating to discrimination in the workplace ultimately leading to the measure of independence enjoyed by Ulster has somewhat diffused the anger that fueled popular support for the IRA in the Catholic community. Ultimately the desire was to live and let live.
Hezbollah and Hamas in contrast want to remove all the Jews 'from the river to the sea'. They don't have an objective that can be negotiated.
The Palestinians want their land back (Palestine, or Israel as we now call it). Israel is not going to let them have it. This is not something that time and common sense is going to resolve.
The PLO renounced violence and changed its objectives. There is a precedent.With respect, Jordan and Egypt are not Iran.
Alright, granted that there has to be a solution, what, apart from the passage of time, and the replacement of angry old fundamentalist settler Jews and rabid Islamist misogynist 'scholars' as they die of old age with a young modern aspirational latte-drinking cosmopolitan elite, do you imagine will turn the tide?
You are describing a hypothetical strategic attack (in Ukraine) on an invading and occupying force intent on invading further.Supposing it was Ukraine doing it in Russia and effectively immobilising Putin's chain of command and, in doing so, 2 children and a couple of dozen civilians were killed?
The modern PLO were swiftly replaced by Hamas after they 'went soft', elected by the Palestinian people who apparently prefer terrorism to a negotiated settlement.The PLO renounced violence and changed its objectives. There is a precedent.
Founded in 1964, it initially sought to establish an Arab state over the entire territory of the former Mandatory Palestine, advocating the elimination of Israel. However, in 1993, the PLO recognized Israeli sovereignty with the Oslo Accords, and now only seeks to establish an independent state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the former territory of which has been militarily occupied by Israel since the 1967 Arab–Israeli War.
So they only ever use them when they’re nowhere near anyone else? Plainly that’s not true.It's not at all indiscriminate. It precisely targeted the Hezbollah operatives that use pagers distributed by their leadership. Nobody else uses those pagers.
which are you saying are acceptable/not acceptable then?Israel blows up Hezbollah pagers/phones/walkie talkies. Acceptable or not?
Hezbollah blows up Israel government pagers/phones/walkie talkies. Acceptable or not?
Russia blows up Ukrainian pagers/phones/walkie talkies. Acceptable or not?
Ukraine blows up Russian pagers/phones/walkie talkies. Acceptable or not?
The ANC blows up South African apartheid government pagers/phones/walkie talkies. Acceptable or not?
South African apartheid givernment blows up ANC pagers/phones/walkie talkies. Acceptable or not?
UK government blows up IRA pagers/phones/walkie talkies. Acceptable or not?
IRA blows up UK government pagers/phones/walkie talkies. Acceptable or not?
I've been "invited" to take sides several times on this thread. I haven't done so but, in the eyes of some (not you) any failure to to do so is automatically supporting the Israeli "death machine".You are describing a hypothetical strategic attack (in Ukraine) on an invading and occupying force intent on invading further.
Hezbollah in Lebanon is not an invading and occupying force in Israel, albeit it would probably like to be, but isn't strong enough.
I would argue that Israel is bound to do what it can to neutralize Hezbollah, albeit this seems to be little more than a wheeze designed to amuse elements of Israeli society rather than achieve anything lasting.
Anyway, I wasn't aware that the thread required anyone to take sides on this issue.
Plainly it is true that these pagers were distributed by Hezbollah leadership to Hezbollah operatives so it wasn't an indiscriminate attack. Sabotaging mobile phones distributed amongst the civilian population would be an indiscriminate attack.I’m
So they only ever use them when they’re nowhere near anyone else? Plainly that’s not true.
I am asking in which circumstances is this tactic acceptable. I didn't say which ones are definitively acceptable or not.which are you saying are acceptable/not acceptable then?