I dare saw you know the old saw about "assume" making an "ass" of "u" and "me", but I think you're restricting that saw to yourself only this time. All four lines of a four line post contain factual errors, which makes it hard to answer really.
Usually the court is abbreviated to ECtHR, to avoid confusion.The ECHR is both the EUROPEAN COURT on HUMAN RIGHTS based in Straasbourg and the EUROPEAN CONVENTION on HUMAN RIGHTS just to be clear.
And if we leave the Convention, judgments by the European Court on Human Rights will no longer apply to us.
The European Convention on Human Rights: leave or stay? You decide | Institute for Government
The question of whether to leave or stay in the ECHR is live again (when is it not?)www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
The whole point of leaving it is to remove or weaken certain rights. I don't know if you intended to use the qualification of UK citizenship, but human rights currently do, and should, apply to all humans in a countries jurisdiction, whether they are citizens or not. One of the aspects I fear might disappear.
Wasn't Tommeh moving to Spain a few years back, what went wrong?
Clutching at straws a bit there...
Why should we have a different one when we started the ECHR?
So what do you think of Farage Putin?
Margaret Thatcher introduced the Single Market. Britain also had more exceptions than any other country. All thrown away by lies.
He lives in Spain but went to Canada on a tour doing podcasts for Rebel News. He cannot even leave Calgary at present.
Why? It's not as if I want it to resemble a nazi salute.... or perhaps it was a case of auto suggestion!
Utter rot.We live and learn, perhaps. Though I don't see much about the ECHR in there. Like I said, Churchill was a keen proponent of European integration, but not with the UK as part of it - the UK had the Empire and Commonwealth as its primary international support.
As for the "not dictating national policy", that's surely a matter of semantics. The ECHR has told Switzerland that its national policy is wrong and illegal. (Besides, it's a strange case. They were sued on the grounds that warmer weather is bad for old people. Received wisdom for centuries has been that cold weather is bad for the old; the number of Americans moving to Florida in old age suggests that their old people haven't learned to love the snow and fear the sun.
Do you really trust the Tories and Reform to replace a constitution in Britain as good as the 18 articles from the ECHR.?
How about the economy?
Some professionals have analysed Reform's proposals.
I'm no economist but it does appear that, unsurprisingly, they amount to little more than a 'back of a fag packet' populist wish list that makes Kwasi Kwarteng look like Adam Smith.
Our take on the Reform UK manifesto
Reform UK has published its manifesto. They plan personal tax cuts which they say will cost £70bn; however our analysis shows that they’ve miscalculated, and the actual cost will be at least £88bn.taxpolicy.org.uk
