This morning, I have enjoyed a full ENGLISH breakfast. ENGLISH eggs, toast, Lurpak butter, marmite, Cumberland sausages, Danepak bacon and Guernsey tomatoes.
We live and learn, perhaps. Though I don't see much about the ECHR in there. Like I said, Churchill was a keen proponent of European integration, but not with the UK as part of it - the UK had the Empire and Commonwealth as its primary international support.You’re not sure Churchill had much to do with it?
The ECHR does not dictate national policy to any country. A group of Swiss women complained to the Court that their own government were not protecting them.
Switzerland condemned by the ECHR: a decisive step for climate justice in Europe
The verdict of the European Court of Human Rights states that Switzerland does not adequately protect its citizens from the effects of climate change, which constitutes a violation of their human rights.www.justiceinfo.net
)Let's hope so and also make the BBC available by subscription only for those that wish to utilize their services with the license fee scrapped for good .
It was Swiss women who went to the court against their own government. Their rights were being protected.We live and learn, perhaps. Though I don't see much about the ECHR in there. Like I said, Churchill was a keen proponent of European integration, but not with the UK as part of it - the UK had the Empire and Commonwealth as its primary international support.
As for the "not dictating national policy", that's surely a matter of semantics. The ECHR has told Switzerland that its national policy is wrong and illegal. (Besides, it's a strange case. They were sued on the grounds that warmer weather is bad for old people. Received wisdom for centuries has been that cold weather is bad for the old; the number of Americans moving to Florida in old age suggests that their old people haven't learned to love the snow and fear the sun.
The ECHR is both the EUROPEAN COURT on HUMAN RIGHTS based in Straasbourg and the EUROPEAN CONVENTION on HUMAN RIGHTS just to be clear.
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
The point is that the ECHR has told the democratically elected Swiss government that they should not be implementing their current government policy.
That's not quite right though. The 1 in 6 (10m+) is made up of:
Again - that's not quite correct.The point is that the ECHR has told the democratically elected Swiss government that they should not be implementing their current government policy.
If you hate to tell me that the Empire has gone, then don't tell me. It's irrelevant to a discussion of Churchill's views in the 1940's. If you hate doing things, and they are of no relevance and don't have to be done, then don't do them. Simples.
The point is that the ECHR has told the democratically elected Swiss government that they should not be implementing their current government policy.
If you hate to tell me that the Empire has gone, then don't tell me. It's irrelevant to a discussion of Churchill's views in the 1940's. If you hate doing things, and they are of no relevance and don't have to be done, then don't do them. Simples.
And the Danish cows? For all intents and purposes, East Anglian?
Right. What's the next policy
taxpolicy.org.uk
I assume you're voting for Reform.The point is that the ECHR has told the democratically elected Swiss government that they should not be implementing their current government policy.
If you hate to tell me that the Empire has gone, then don't tell me. It's irrelevant to a discussion of Churchill's views in the 1940's. If you hate doing things, and they are of no relevance and don't have to be done, then don't do them. Simples.
Danish cows? Nobody told me about that.
