I am genuinely surprised that so many on here are using the "there, but for the grace of God, go we all" argument. I would make the following observations:
1) He's the highly visible CEO of a global business generating £bn pa. That organisation has sponsorship arrangements with other global businesses. Different standards concerning behaviour apply to people in those positions than to those in less high profile roles.
2) it's now all but certain that he used a work email account. Just about any organisation has rules barring employees doing what it seems he has done.
3) He's 54, FFS. How many 54 year olds would make such remarks in an email, personal or otherwise?
I stand by my original position - it would be commercial suicide for the PL for him to stay and he has been utterly, utterly stupid. Would you really want someone of such limited awareness to hold the post of CEO of your organisation?
1) He's the highly visible CEO of a global business generating £bn pa. That organisation has sponsorship arrangements with other global businesses. Different standards concerning behaviour apply to people in those positions than to those in less high profile roles.
2) it's now all but certain that he used a work email account. Just about any organisation has rules barring employees doing what it seems he has done.
3) He's 54, FFS. How many 54 year olds would make such remarks in an email, personal or otherwise?
I stand by my original position - it would be commercial suicide for the PL for him to stay and he has been utterly, utterly stupid. Would you really want someone of such limited awareness to hold the post of CEO of your organisation?