And if so, who would you nominate?
Obviously they wouldn't sit in on regular business / confidential club matters etc, but rather would be invited to participate in a specific agenda item entitled "Current supporter issues" or whatever.
Any value in these sorts of initiatives, or are they just fan-friendly gimmicks that promise much but ultimately go nowhere meaningful? I'm undecided. The right person, with a well-rounded view of all sides of the debate could probably add some value to both sides - the fans and the executives. But then the risk is that they simple end up becoming a bit of a lick spittle...
To avoid that happening, my vote would be in the Ernest CAMP. Where would you put your "x" ?
Obviously they wouldn't sit in on regular business / confidential club matters etc, but rather would be invited to participate in a specific agenda item entitled "Current supporter issues" or whatever.
Any value in these sorts of initiatives, or are they just fan-friendly gimmicks that promise much but ultimately go nowhere meaningful? I'm undecided. The right person, with a well-rounded view of all sides of the debate could probably add some value to both sides - the fans and the executives. But then the risk is that they simple end up becoming a bit of a lick spittle...
To avoid that happening, my vote would be in the Ernest CAMP. Where would you put your "x" ?