brightonmark1234
Well-known member
both in my view
I think worse that than the result last night, and worse than the fact it was by Palace, is the realisation that the honeymoon period at the Amex is now over.
Leeds should have been the wake up call - the tactics were completely wrong.
Last night we were exposed as lacking in most areas.
We have League 1 players who arent up to it - Dicker, Painter, Sparrow.
We have expensive £1 Million+ players who cant even get near the first team for various reasons - Hoskins, Buckley.
We have a midfielder who cant be arsed - Harley.
We have KLL, who chases the ball like a kitten chases a ping pong ball.
The only player who caused any real damage last night gets subbed - Noone
Seeing Murray last night bought home what he had brought to to the team previously - what a massive mistake to let him go, and so cheaply.
For me it was, at Selhurst in 2002 we had not won for ten games and had a team that cost a tenner between them.
Last night we had the benefit of a decent budget, an excellent playing surface, 20,000 fans (in theory), a good start to the season....... but were toilet.
That is a very good point. When future generations look back the 5-0 WILL be seen as just 'one of those things' given the circumstances of the club at the time. Some hoary old grandads might say how bad it was to be there that day, but the younger ones I think will be more concerned with the fact that Palace were the first team EVER to win a league game at the Amex - and boy have they gone on about it ever since.No brainer,last night palace put there name into our club history as the 1st club to beat us in a league game at the Amex...
Palace were the first team EVER to win a league game at the Amex - and boy have they gone on about it ever since.
Time appears to be a great healer for some. That 5-0 was the most shambolic performance I think I have ever seen. Last night was a bitter disappointment because we could have easily beaten them, but saw it unfolding horrifically over 70 minutes, but it wasn't a patch on 26/10/02.
To recall, I know we had lost 10 games on the spin, but Coppell had joined 1 game beforehand, we hadn't played Palace for years and took 6,000 up there. The whole day was a nightmare. Even Zamora was f***ing gash.
That is a very good point. When future generations look back the 5-0 WILL be seen as just 'one of those things' given the circumstances of the club at the time. Some hoary old grandads might say how bad it was to be there that day, but the younger ones I think will be more concerned with the fact that Palace were the first team EVER to win a league game at the Amex - and boy have they gone on about it ever since.
but only the SIXTH club to win there......
1 - BHA reserves
2 - Tottenham H
3 - BHA
4 - Liverpool
5 - Leeds
6 - Palace
Leeds didn't win.
Certainly the same. As you say in 2002 we KNEW we weren't very good, simply getting into the Championship had been an achievement given the fact we were playing at Withdean and were also fighting the planning battle. The best we were hoping for was that we'd be competitive and maybe we could sneak a win against the run of play. Ok, in fact we got battered but the defeat itself wasn't a total surprise.
Long before last night there'd been talk of a seismic change in the Brighton/Palace relationship, how we were going to be the big team, how our crowds and our stadium were going to eclipse theirs. Last night was simply meant to be the rubber-stamping of this change and we were going to win easily. Instead it confirmed that they're still the top dogs (as they have been for the last 30 years) and the revolution has been postponed.
Football, gotta love it haven't you?