Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Why did we sell Burn?



Neville's Breakfast

Well-known member
May 1, 2016
13,450
Oxton, Birkenhead
Where can you get a top class premier league ready centre half for 13 million, ? We should of sold for twice that amount , bad decision

And they would have paid it because they were desperate. There is no such thing as true value of a footballer. It’s all about who holds the stronger position. In mitigation for the club Burn wanted to go which is the only thing Newcastle had on their side.
 






trueblue

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,964
Hove
Yes, you were. People who played the game at the top level probably know more than you.

:lolol:

Who exactly was saying Dan Burn was more important to Newcastle than Tripper then? Because certainly nobody I've seen of any credibility.
 








Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,888
West west west Sussex
I’m really not sure £13m less Wigan’s share would make that much of a difference to TB. We’re sitting on £80m plus for Bissouma and Lamptey at least and got £50m for White.

I just think there are times when you shouldn’t find excuses for a poor decision. We all make them…..


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

How can you conclude it was a poor decision?
The team has only played 270 minutes of league football and Burn clearly wasn't going to play for 180 of those minutes.
 


albionalex

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2009
4,743
Toronto
Which turned out to be an outstanding deal, but at the time, Veltman hadn't got 4 years of PL football under his belt. As we've seen, to our considerable cost, the Eredivisie churns out a LOT more duds than than gems.

When Burn left us for £13m, he was a battle-hardened, proven PL defender who had established himself as a versatile and important member of our team. Nobody is irreplacable, but we would do very well to find someone of his experience and skillset now, for £13m.

The fact the horse-punchers are so delighted with this deal should tell you all you need to know.

Ostigard, Van Hecke, Clarke etc. cost less than £13m combined. Selling Burn creates the pathway for them.
 


















erkan

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2004
896
Eastbourne
And they would have paid it because they were desperate. There is no such thing as true value of a footballer. It’s all about who holds the stronger position. In mitigation for the club Burn wanted to go which is the only thing Newcastle had on their side.
I'm afraid this is what happens when a football club is run by people with no experience of making deals. We were easy meat for the more business savvy Geordies.
 




Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,787
GOSBTS
Wooshed I think ?
 
Last edited:


Neville's Breakfast

Well-known member
May 1, 2016
13,450
Oxton, Birkenhead
I'm afraid this is what happens when a football club is run by people with no experience of making deals. We were easy meat for the more business savvy Geordies.

Sarcasm so subtle as to nearly not be sarcasm at all. Clearly BHA is run by very clever businessmen but that doesn’t mean we all have to agree with every deal they make. My post shows that I am on the fence on this one.
 








Swansman

Pro-peace
May 13, 2019
22,320
Sweden
And they would have paid it because they were desperate. There is no such thing as true value of a footballer. It’s all about who holds the stronger position. In mitigation for the club Burn wanted to go which is the only thing Newcastle had on their side.

I suggest you forward your financial advice to billionaire Tony Bloom so that we wont have these things happening any more..
 


Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,429
Location Location
Not this season, no. But as I said, Burn leaving creates the pathway for their returns in the summer.

Obi-Wan Kenobi: "But Master Yoda says I should be mindful of the future."
Qui-Gon Jinn: "But not at the expense of the moment...."
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here