The bookies must be raking in the money...Betting odds mean absolutely nothing ffs.
Ah well, each to their own. He left, he took the time to explain his rationale to us fans, something not many managers would have done. He gave us three full seasons and some whereas RDZ was agitating to leave after less than two. If he comes back I would be delighted. Now bookies favourite .I am flabbergasted that 57 folk in here voted for the return of Potter, I really am, he may have a similar set of stats to RDZ, but by god, his departure and that of his sycophants in the aftermath has really left a sour taste... he won't get my support.
Not really. Some mug punter probably put a grand on him at 14/1 this morning!The bookies must be raking in the money...
Tony Bloom?Not really. Some mug punter probably put a grand on him at 14/1 this morning!
Agreed.Should he be offered the job rest assured that he’ll turn it down
Should he be offered the job rest assured that he’ll turn it down
Betting odds mean only one thing; there are a lot of stupid people about to lose a lot of money. They have no bearing on even the likelihood of our club being interested.
He wouldn't be offered the job unless TB/PB knew he'd accept it.Should he be offered the job rest assured that he’ll turn it down
Indeed. I put a not insignificant sum on one of the contenders who was about 8th in the running and they went up to second.This is your periodic reminder that bookies odds are calculated entirely through who people are placing the most money on and bear no actual relation to likelihood.
For example, until lunchtime yesterday a General Election in October / November was the overwhelming bookies favourite.
I’m still unsure…How many times does it have to be explained that the bookies odds are not an indicator of real life happenings in a managerial choice ?
(Unless someone is 1/10 or something silly and their is clear evidence the club are in talks)
What rationale?.. like Cucurella, he left with barely a backwards glance, the delayed statement from him was mostly fluff and nonsense... I will always support the team of course, but he won't get any sycophantic plaudits from me on any potential return, neither will his money grabbing sidekicks.Ah well, each to their own. He left, he took the time to explain his rationale to us fans, something not many managers would have done. He gave us three full seasons and some whereas RDZ was agitating to leave after less than two. If he comes back I would be delighted. Now bookies favourite .
It appears all this has stemmed from a Times writer suggesting he is a back up if we don't get the Ipswich bloke. So someone has put a tenner on it.I’m still unsure…
Can you explain it in plain English ?