Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Where is Stephen Ward????



















Superphil

Dismember
Jul 7, 2003
25,679
In a pile of football shirts
I wonder who caved in on their demands? My hunch is us unfortunately.

That's the spirit, keep the dream going.

Or

The reason it's taken so long is because we have a professional in charge, and we have stuck to our guns.
 


Keeping The Dream Alive.

Naming Rights
May 28, 2008
3,059
WSU
That's the spirit, keep the dream going.

Or

The reason it's taken so long is because we have a professional in charge, and we have stuck to our guns.

Or,

with the Buckley transfer about to go through, we desperately need to avoid a PR shambles and made sure we had some positive news to combat losing another star player.

I guess it's hard to be positive right now!
 




Superphil

Dismember
Jul 7, 2003
25,679
In a pile of football shirts
Or,

with the Buckley transfer about to go through, we desperately need to avoid a PR shambles and made sure we had some positive news to combat losing another star player.

I guess it's hard to be positive right now!

I don't believe Bloom would do something like that as a 'PR' exercise. I might be trying to be positive, but think about it, Bloom and his poker face, Barber the CEO of the year, even the much maligned Burke, who,is superbly qualified and experienced, I just don't think they'd bottle it. IMO of course.
 
















Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,947
Surrey
That's the spirit, keep the dream going.

Or

The reason it's taken so long is because we have a professional in charge, and we have stuck to our guns.

Why are you assuming that Wolves DON'T have a professional in charge? All this "don't mess with Uncle Tony" bollox is pìssing me off. It has quite clearly cost us some decent transfer targets in the past few months.

Let's recap the situation: as I understand it, Wolves were paying Ward 13k a week, and we weren't prepared to pay more than 10k a week. However, whilst that got resolved, the real issue was that Wolves wanted a fee.

We have now had three months since we showed interest - that's about £120k we've saved by not paying Ward's wages in that time. Meanwhile, Wolves have had no other interest for Ward and are dangerously close to being lumbered with a £1m bill in wasted wages. Equally, we are dangerously close to having no proper left back.

Quite clearly, we'll have ended up paying a nominal fee (half or maybe even less of the figure Wolves were looking for) and resolving it. It's got nothing to do with anybody caving in, IMO.
 


Superphil

Dismember
Jul 7, 2003
25,679
In a pile of football shirts
Why are you assuming that Wolves DON'T have a professional in charge? All this "don't mess with Uncle Tony" bollox is pìssing me off. It has quite clearly cost us some decent transfer targets in the past few months.

Let's recap the situation: as I understand it, Wolves were paying Ward 13k a week, and we weren't prepared to pay more than 10k a week. However, whilst that got resolved, the real issue was that Wolves wanted a fee.

We have now had three months since we showed interest - that's about £120k we've saved by not paying Ward's wages in that time. Meanwhile, Wolves have had no other interest for Ward and are dangerously close to being lumbered with a £1m bill in wasted wages. Equally, we are dangerously close to having no proper left back.

Quite clearly, we'll have ended up paying a nominal fee (half or maybe even less of the figure Wolves were looking for) and resolving it. It's got nothing to do with anybody caving in, IMO.

I didn't say, and certainly didn't assume, they don't have a professional. I said that the Albion do, and perhaps, because of that, the Albion were sticking to their guns and not either rolling over, nor walking away.
 


Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,947
Surrey
I didn't say, and certainly didn't assume, they don't have a professional. I said that the Albion do, and perhaps, because of that, the Albion were sticking to their guns and not either rolling over, nor walking away.
That's fair enough and it wasn't a dig at you as much as a dig at the default answer to everything getting done last minute being down to how we are so incredibly professional.

It's nothing of the sort IMO. It's more of a case of the club casting it's net far and wide on a raft of "moneyball" signings and only come of them working out. There was nothing professional about the club losing out on the signing of Virgil Van Dijk, for example.
 


Kikikaikai

Charlatan?
May 20, 2014
139
Brighton
On the motorway?...
 




hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,759
Chandlers Ford
There was nothing professional about the club losing out on the signing of Virgil Van Dijk, for example.

I think that's miles wide of the mark, tbh.

The fact that our network identified Van Dijk in the first place, and got us in with a shout of signing him, is very promising in itself.

That his agent then (did his JOB, and) used our interest to eventually flush out interest from a bigger club, with more to offer him, is just how these things work sometimes.

I fail to see any lack of preffessionalism in that saga. Please explain?
 


Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,947
Surrey
I think that's miles wide of the mark, tbh.

The fact that our network identified Van Dijk in the first place, and got us in with a shout of signing him, is very promising in itself.

That his agent then (did his JOB, and) used our interest to eventually flush out interest from a bigger club, with more to offer him, is just how these things work sometimes.

I fail to see any lack of preffessionalism in that saga. Please explain?

I don't need to. I obviously got it wrong. I thought we'd stalled over money, as has seemingly been the case with the likes of Mason or Grabban...
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here