Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
That’s it, time to start sweatingThen why release the information at all?
That’s it, time to start sweatingThen why release the information at all?
Why not draw your own conclusions with all your fellow tedious African Chelsea "supporting" chums on TheShedEnd? We don't care what you think or have to say.Then why release the information at all?
I wonder whether the vague language of 'surpassing' rather than a figure being mentioned could mean some kind of money plus player offer. They are rare, but the likes of Man U have certainly got a few players they want rid of and there were rumours last month that they might want to use one of them to make a bid for Caicedo. If there are players involved, it could explain why the club is unnamed.The article is titled "Brighton reject offer for Caicedo", and includes:
"The bid, from an as yet unidentified club, is said to surpass Chelsea's most recent offer for the 21-year-old Ecuador international that was worth a total of £80million."
Get ready to watch Fred and McTominay next season buddyI wonder whether the vague language of 'surpassing' rather than a figure being mentioned could mean some kind of money plus player offer. They are rare, but the likes of Man U have certainly got a few players they want rid of and there were rumours last month that they might want to use one of them to make a bid for Caicedo. If there are players involved, it could explain why the club is unnamed.
That's exactly what I'm thinking.I wonder whether the vague language of 'surpassing' rather than a figure being mentioned could mean some kind of money plus player offer. They are rare, but the likes of Man U have certainly got a few players they want rid of and there were rumours last month that they might want to use one of them to make a bid for Caicedo. If there are players involved, it could explain why the club is unnamed.
Yer it's a bit of a shame. Naylor would only have got this off the Albion. And the Albion wouldn't be releasing this info if not keen to sell
£120 million plus Fred and/or Mctominay, or £100 million.Imo neither Fred nor Mctominay would be good moves for us - Kelvin Phillips if City maybe?
To put an end to this borefest from Chelsea. Pay up or f*** off and buy someone else. Personally I hope he stays and if not he goes to a team playing in Europe next season.Then why release the information at all?
McTominay alongside Gilmour has been working just fine for Scotland recently.Get ready to watch Fred and McTominay next season buddy
I’ve just checked on that shit forum. Only 2 posts in their Caicedo thread in the last 2 hours……Why not draw your own conclusions with all your fellow tedious African Chelsea "supporting" chums on TheShedEnd? We don't care what you think or have to say.
Why not ? It's the journalist's job. Lol.Then why release the information at all?
And the timing of talksport reporting it (barbers other best mates , for some reason) gives the game away that barber released this info.....(I reckon)Whoever the other club are, this the key bit. For the first time throughout all this, my optimism has taken a knock. And it's @dwayne's fault
Thing is, it's not Chelsea anymore - they've made god knows how many bids, been knocked back and are now looking at other options (as well as having purchased Ugochukwu).To put an end to this borefest from Chelsea. Pay up or f*** off and buy someone else. Personally I hope he stays and if not he goes to a team playing in Europe next season.
But how would the journalist know? Ie what was the source of the info?Why not ? It's the journalist's job. Lol.
For that reason I’m going LiverpoolProbably a club, like the Albion, who don’t want to do business on SM with twattish fans wading in with their entitled bollocks and Here We Go Romano aggravating the situation?