Man City to activate their buy back clause for Lavia, and use him in a deal for Caicedo… a man can dream
Yer but if you've watched him for England he is quality. Although seems to be a tad overrated.It’s been widely reported TB values Caciedo at £100m+ and adamant he’s a better player than Rice. I have to agree watching Rice live I really didn’t notice him on the pitch against us.
January tax though. 85 plus add ons feels about right. Would be slightly shocked if Chelsea can't / won't get up to that number.Why would the £100 million be a bluff?
If we are going to compare any transfer (and I'm not sure you can) then the obvious one is Enzo Fernandez.
Don't forget Fernandez was signed as the new DM for Chelsea. Chelsea now see fit to add another DM to help him out. He played half a seasonish for Benfica and has less experience over all. Obviously he won the World Cup, but I'm not sure that adds any real value to a player.
So the team who want Moises paid 100 million for a less experienced player who plays in the same position, just six months ago. That's your benchmark.
I won't be shocked at all. After Chelsea spunked so much money on players they have now decided that they will play hardball with transfers. Just one little thing to remember here peeps. Tony Bloom! Try and hard ball our Tony and you won't be buying the player.January tax though. 85 plus add ons feels about right. Would be slightly shocked if Chelsea can't / won't get up to that number.
But where do we get these figures from? Why is 80-85 about right? I still don't understand the logic in this. The two big DM transfers of the last sixish months have been EF and the soon to be completed Rice. If both of those are over 100 how is Moises not worth that?January tax though. 85 plus add ons feels about right. Would be slightly shocked if Chelsea can't / won't get up to that number.
Enzo had the January taxBut where do we get these figures from? Why is 80-85 about right? I still don't understand the logic in this. The two big DM transfers of the last sixish months have been EF and the soon to be completed Rice. If both of those are over 100 how is Moises not worth that?
That would be insane. The reason mac went cheap was on the basis of one contract running down and the new one therefore offering a compromise.Perhaps that was the deal when he signed? We let Mac Allister go to the club of his dreams for half price, we'll do the same for you - but you're only 21, he was 24, so the deal won't come in until the end of one more season?
....and another WC winning midfielder went for £35/£55M...........But where do we get these figures from? Why is 80-85 about right? I still don't understand the logic in this. The two big DM transfers of the last sixish months have been EF and the soon to be completed Rice. If both of those are over 100 how is Moises not worth that?
I think those that believe Caicedo will stay are going to be disappointed.
I think those that want us to pocket £100m (or more) are going to be disappointed.
80-85I think those that believe Caicedo will stay are going to be disappointed.
I think those that want us to pocket £100m (or more) are going to be disappointed.
Naylor confirming still no contact from Chelsea. I wonder what they are waiting on ?Hope it gets done asap tbh
I'm expecting 60m to be the final figure that gets unofficially published
Bit of a nonsense though - bit like nothing agreed for MacAllister when he moved 2 days later. Or no fee agreed with Chelsea for Cucurella, complete with Brighton statement - for him to then move 24 hours later80-85
Naylor confirming still no contact from Chelsea. I wonder what they are waiting on ?
Yes but no talks at all? What's the hold up in even making contact?Bit of a nonsense though - bit like nothing agreed for MacAllister when he moved 2 days later. Or no fee agreed with Chelsea for Cucurella, complete with Brighton statement - for him to then move 24 hours later